ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How to correctly use the protocol interference model for multi-hop wireless networks
Full text PdfPdf (604 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
New Orleans, LA, USA
SESSION: Performance evaluation table of contents
Pages 239-248  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-624-3
Authors
Yi Shi  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Y. Thomas Hou  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Jia Liu  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Sastry Kompella  U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 59,   Downloads (12 Months): 220,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1530748.1530782
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper tries to reconcile the tension between physical model and protocol model that have been used to characterize interference relationship in a multi-hop wireless network. The physical model (a.k.a. SINR model) is widely considered as a reference model for physical layer behavior but its application in multi-hop wireless networks is limited by its complexity. On the other hand, the protocol model (a.k.a. unified disk graph model) is simple but there have been doubts on its validity. This paper explores the following fundamental question: How to correctly use the protocol interference model? We show that in general, solutions obtained under the protocol model may be infeasible in practice and thus, results based on blind use of protocol model can be misleading. We propose a novel concept called "reality check" and present a method of using protocol model with reality check for wireless networks. Subsequently, we show that by appropriate setting of the interference range in the protocol model, it is possible to narrow the solution gap between the two models. Our simulation results confirm that this gap is indeed small (or even negligible). Thus, our methodology of joint reality check and interference range setting retains the protocol model as a viable approach to analyze multi-hop wireless networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Ahlswede. Multi-way communication channels. In International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings, pages 23--52.Tsahkadsor, Armenian S.S.R., 1971.
2
 
3
P. Bergmans. Random coding theorem for broadcast channels with degraded components. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 19(2):197--207, March 1973.
 
4
R. Bhatia and M. Kodialam. On power efficient communication over multi-hop wireless networks: joint routing, scheduling and power control. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, pages 1457--1466. Hong Kong, China, March 7-11, 2004.
 
5
C.C. Chen and D.S. Lee. A joint design of distributed QoS scheduling and power control for wireless networks. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, 12 pages. Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, April 23-29, 2006.
 
6
M. Costa. Writing on dirty paper. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 29(3):439--441, May 1983.
 
7
T.M. Cover. Broadcast channels. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 18(1):2--14, Jan. 1972.
 
8
R.L. Cruz and A.V. Santhanam. Optimal routing, link scheduling and power control in multi-hop wireless networks. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, pages 702--711. San Francisco, CA, March 30--April 3, 2003.
9
 
10
T. Elbatt and A. Ephremides. Joint scheduling and power control for wireless ad-hoc networks. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, pages 976--984. New York, NY, June 23-27, 2002.
 
11
 
12
A.J. Goldsmith and S.-G. Chua. Adaptive coded modulation for fading channels. IEEE Trans. on Communications, 46(5):595--602, May 1998.
 
13
P. Gupta and P.R. Kumar. The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 46(2):388--404, March 2000.
14
 
15
Y.T. Hou, Y. Shi, and H.D. Sherali. Optimal spectrum sharing for multi-hop software defined radio networks. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, pages 1--9. Anchorage, AL, May 6-12, 2007.
16
17
18
 
19
X. Qiu and K. Chawla. On the performance of adaptive modulation in cellular systems. IEEE Trans. on Communications, 47(6):884--895, May 1999.
 
20
K. Ramachandran, E. Belding-Royer, K. Almeroth, and M. Buddhikot. Interference-aware channel assignment in multi-radio wireless mesh networks. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, 12 pages. Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, April 23-29, 2006.
 
21
A. Raniwala and T. Chiueh. Architecture and algorithms for an IEEE 802.11-based multi-channel wireless mesh network. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, pages 2223--2234. Miami, FL, March 13-17, 2005.
 
22
Y. Shi and Y.T. Hou. Optimal power control for multi-hop software defined radio networks. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, pages 1694--1702. Anchorage, AL, May 6-12, 2007.
 
23
J. Tang, G. Xue, C. Chandler, and W. Zhang. Interference-aware routing in multihop wireless networks using directional antennas. In IEEE Infocom Proceedings, pages 751--760. Miami, FL, March 13-17, 2005.
24
25

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yi Shi: colleagues
Y. Thomas Hou: colleagues
Jia Liu: colleagues
Sastry Kompella: colleagues