ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Revenue generation for truthful spectrum auction in dynamic spectrum access
Full text PdfPdf (838 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
New Orleans, LA, USA
SESSION: Spectrum allocation and management table of contents
Pages 3-12  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-624-3
Authors
Juncheng Jia  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Qian Zhang  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Qin Zhang  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Mingyan Liu  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 41,   Downloads (12 Months): 174,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1530748.1530751
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Spectrum is a critical yet scarce resource and it has been shown that dynamic spectrum access can significantly improve spectrum utilization. To achieve this, it is important to incentivize the primary license holders to open up their under-utilized spectrum for sharing. In this paper we present a secondary spectrum market where a primary license holder can sell access to its unused or under-used spectrum resources in the form of certain fine-grained spectrum-space-time unit. Secondary wireless service providers can purchase such contracts to deploy new service, enhance their existing service, or deploy ad hoc service to meet flash crowds demand. Within the context of this market, we investigate how to use auction mechanisms to allocate and price spectrum resources so that the primary license holder's revenue is maximized. We begin by classifying a number of alternative auction formats in terms of spectrum demand. We then study a specific auction format where secondary wireless service providers have demands for fixed locations (cells). We propose an optimal auction based on the concept of virtual valuation. Assuming the knowledge of valuation distributions, the optimal auction uses the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism to maximize the expected revenue while enforcing truthfulness. To reduce the computational complexity, we further design a truthful suboptimal auction with polynomial time complexity. It uses a monotone allocation and critical value payment to enforce truthfulness. Simulation results show that this suboptimal auction can generate stable expected revenue.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
 
5
S. Haykin. Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,, 23(2):201--220, 2005.
 
6
Q. Zhao, L. Tong, A. Swami, and Y. Chen. Decentralized cognitive MAC for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hoc networks: A POMDP framework. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(3):589--600, 2007.
 
7
P. Cramton. The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6(3):431--495, 1997.
8
 
9
S. Huang, X. Liu, and Z. Ding. Opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. In The 27th Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE INFOCOM), pages 1427--1435, 2008.
 
10
D.N. Hatfield and P.J. Weiser. Property rights in spectrum: taking the next step. In First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (IEEE DySPAN), pages 43--55, 2005.
 
11
L. Doyle and T. Forde. Towards a Fluid Spectrum Market for Exclusive Usage Rights. In 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (IEEE DySPAN), pages 620--632, 2007.
 
12
R.B. Myerson. Optimal Auction Design. MATH. OPER. RES., 6(1):58--73, 1981.
 
13
14
15
 
16
A. Mu'alem and N. Nisan. Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, 2008.
 
17
V. Grimm, F. Riedel, and E. Wolfstetter. Low price equilibrium in multi-unit auctions: the GSM spectrum auction in Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(10):1557--1569, 2003.
 
18
T. Borgers, C. Dustmann, and G. Street. Strange Bids: Bidding Behaviour in the United Kingdom's Third Generation Spectrum Auction. Economic Journal, 115(505):551--578, 2005.
 
19
Y. Wu, B. Wang, K.J.R. Liu, and T.C. Clancy. A Multi-Winner Cognitive Spectrum Auction Framework with Collusion-Resistant Mechanisms. In 3rd IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (IEEE DySPAN), pages 1--9, 2008.
 
20
A.P. Subramanian, M. Al-Ayyoub, H. Gupta, S.R. Das, and M.M.Buddhikot. Near-Optimal Dynamic Spectrum Allocation in Cellular Networks. In 3rd IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (IEEE DySPAN), pages 1--11, 2008.
 
21
 
22
D. Niyato and E. Hossain. A game-theoretic approach to competitive spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE WCNC), pages 16--20, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Juncheng Jia: colleagues
Qian Zhang: colleagues
Qin Zhang: colleagues
Mingyan Liu: colleagues