ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Alternatives to conjunctive query processing in peer-to-peer file-sharing systems
Full text PdfPdf (974 KB)
Source
Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Information access and retrieval track table of contents
Pages 1737-1741  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
Authors
Wai Gen Yee  Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL
Linh Thai Nguyen  Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL
Ophir Frieder  Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529671
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Peer-to-peer file-sharing systems suffer from the over-specification of query results due to the fact that query processing is conjunctive and the descriptions of shared files are sparse. Ultimately, longer queries, which should yield more accurate results, do the opposite. To alleviate this problem, we consider alternative means of query processing. That is, results are sent from the server to the client only if they are deemed relevant based on cosine similarity. Based on our results, these alternatives can increase query accuracy by 40% at virtually no cost.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
M. Nilsson. Id3v2 web site. www.id3.org. 2007.
 
4
I. Muslea and T. J. Lee. Online Query Relaxation via Bayesian Causal Structures Discovery. In Proc. AAAI, 2005.
 
5
C. Rohrs. Keyword matching {in gnutella}. Technical report, LimeWire, Dec. 2000. www.limewire.org/techdocs/KeywordMatching.htm.
 
6
S. Saroiu, P. K. Gummadi, S. D. Gribble. A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In Proc. Multimed Comp. and Netw. (MMCN), 2002.
 
7
M. T. Schlosser, T. E. Condie, and S. D. Kamvar. Simulating a file-sharing p2p network. In Proc. Wkshp. Semantics in Peer-to-Peer and Grid Comp., 2003.
8
9
 
10
W. G. Yee, L. T. Nguyen, and O. Frieder. Masked Queries for Search Accuracy in Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Systems. In Proc. IEEE IPDPS, 2007.
11
12
13
 
14
15
 
16
P. Godfrey, Minimization in Cooperative Response to Failing Database Queries, International Journal of Cooperative Information System (IJCIS), World Scientific, 6(2):95--149, June 1997.
 
17
IIT P2P Information Retrieval System Web Site. www.ir.iit.edu/~waigen/pirs.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wai Gen Yee: colleagues
Linh Thai Nguyen: colleagues
Ophir Frieder: colleagues