ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Diverse peer selection in collaborative web search
Full text PdfPdf (381 KB)
Source
Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Information access and retrieval track table of contents
Pages 1709-1713  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
Authors
Le-Shin Wu  Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
Filippo Menczer  Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 40,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529666
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Effective peer selection for intelligent query routing is a challenge in collaborative peer-based Web search systems, especially unstructured networks that do not have any centralized control of peer document collections. In particular, routing a query to multiple peers that provide the same results is a waste of resources. To deal with overlapping document collections we propose a diverse peer selection approach for adaptive query routing. This approach takes into account not only which neighbors are the best resource providers for a given query, but also which combinations of neighbors can provide the least redundant results. We validate the feasibility of our proposed algorithm by presenting several simulation experiments conducted with different configurations of peer network environments. Two novel evaluation measures, distributed precision and distributed recall, are also introduced to provide an effective comparison of different peer network systems. These two performance measures extend the well known IR measures of precision and recall by integrating network costs, namely bandwidth and latency. Our algorithm finds results of equivalent quality using less time and generating less traffic in the presence of varying amounts of document duplication.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
 
5
A. Crespo and H. Garcia-Molina. Semantic overlay networks for P2P systems. Technical report, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 2002.
 
6
P. Haase, R. Siebes, and F. van Harmelen. Peer selection in peer-to-peer networks with semantic topologies. In ICSNW, pages 108--125, 2004.
7
 
8
 
9
I. A. Klampanos, V. Poznański, J. M. Jose, and P. Dickman. A suite of testbeds for the realistic evaluation of peer-to-peer information retrieval systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3408:38--51, 2005.
10
11
 
12
J. A. Shaw and E. A. Fox. Combination of multiple searches. In Text REtrieval Conference, pages 0--, 1994.
 
13
C. Suel, T amd Mathur, J.-W. Wu, J. Zhang, A. Delis, M. Kharrazi, X. Long, and K. Shanmugasundaram. ODISSEA: A Peer-to-Peer architecture for scalable Web search and information retrieval. In Intl. Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB), 2003.
14
15
 
16
L.-S. Wu, R. Akavipat, and F. Menczer. 6S: Distributing crawling and searching across Web peers. In Proc. of the IASTED Intl. Conf. on Web technologies, Applications, and Services, Calgary, Canada, 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Le-Shin Wu: colleagues
Filippo Menczer: colleagues