ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Modeling and analyzing review information on the web focusing on credibility
Full text PdfPdf (299 KB)
Source
Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
POSTER SESSION: Poster papers table of contents
Pages 1316-1317  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
Authors
Takuya Kobayashi  Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan
Hiroaki Ohshima  Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan
Satoshi Oyama  Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan
Katsumi Tanaka  Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529577
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we modeled review information to assess its credibility. We think the information to support users in credibility evaluation of reviews is necessary. This paper presents method for detecting reviewers' activity areas and biases. We also discuss the problem of glorified terms in online reviews. As these terms cause cognitive bias, supporting information that enables accurate understanding is needed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. W. Lauw, E.-P. Lim, and K. Wang. Summarizing review scores of "unequal" reviewers. In SDM. SIAM, 2007.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Takuya Kobayashi: colleagues
Hiroaki Ohshima: colleagues
Satoshi Oyama: colleagues
Katsumi Tanaka: colleagues