|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
In this paper we modeled review information to assess its credibility. We think the information to support users in credibility evaluation of reviews is necessary. This paper presents method for detecting reviewers' activity areas and biases. We also discuss the problem of glorified terms in online reviews. As these terms cause cognitive bias, supporting information that enables accurate understanding is needed. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||