| Geographical data collection in sensor networks with self-organizing transaction cluster-heads |
| Full text |
Pdf
(381 KB)
|
Source
|
Symposium on Applied Computing
archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Self-organization in pervasive distributed systems track
table of contents
Pages 1214-1218
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
Neeraj Rajgure
|
National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan and New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ
|
|
Eric Platon
|
National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Cristian Borcea
|
New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ
|
|
Shinichi Honiden
|
National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16, Downloads (12 Months): 69, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes 2G, a flexible and energy-efficient data collection protocol for sensor networks for increasing network lifetime. To this end, it integrates self-organizing data aggregation mechanisms based on geographical and cluster-based routing, and transaction cluster-head (TCH). A TCH is a location-based role, dynamically assigned to a node for the duration of handling a request-response transaction that targets its region of the network. TCH nodes collect raw sensor readings from their local regions and forward the answers containing aggregated data using geographical routing. A prototype of 2G was implemented on MICAz motes, and experimental results in realistic conditions proved that data collection reaches significantly higher delivery rates than with GEAR, the geographical routing protocol leveraged by 2G. Additionally, simulation results for larger scale networks demonstrate that 2G outperforms GEAR in terms of network lifetime.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
K. Akkaya and M. F. Younis. A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3): 325--349, 2005.
|
| |
2
|
J. A. Aslam, Q. Li, and D. Rus. Three power-aware routing algorithms for sensor networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 3(2): 187--208, 2003.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
L. Fang, W. Du, and P. Ning. A beacon-less location discovery scheme for wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM, pages 161--171. IEEE, 2005.
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
Philip Levis , Nelson Lee , Matt Welsh , David Culler, TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 05-07, 2003, Los Angeles, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/958491.958506]
|
| |
9
|
Crossbow micaz platform, 2008. Accessed in October 2008.
|
| |
10
|
E. Platon and Y. Sei. Security software engineering in wireless sensor networks. Progress in Informatics, 5(1): 1--19, 2008.
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
Karim Seada , Marco Zuniga , Ahmed Helmy , Bhaskar Krishnamachari, Energy-efficient forwarding strategies for geographic routing in lossy wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031509]
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Y. Yu, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Geographical and energy aware routing: A recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks. Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR-01-0023, UCLA Computer Science Department, May 2001.
|
|