ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Geographical data collection in sensor networks with self-organizing transaction cluster-heads
Full text PdfPdf (381 KB)
Source
Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Self-organization in pervasive distributed systems track table of contents
Pages 1214-1218  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
Authors
Neeraj Rajgure  National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan and New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ
Eric Platon  National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
Cristian Borcea  New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ
Shinichi Honiden  National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529553
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes 2G, a flexible and energy-efficient data collection protocol for sensor networks for increasing network lifetime. To this end, it integrates self-organizing data aggregation mechanisms based on geographical and cluster-based routing, and transaction cluster-head (TCH). A TCH is a location-based role, dynamically assigned to a node for the duration of handling a request-response transaction that targets its region of the network. TCH nodes collect raw sensor readings from their local regions and forward the answers containing aggregated data using geographical routing. A prototype of 2G was implemented on MICAz motes, and experimental results in realistic conditions proved that data collection reaches significantly higher delivery rates than with GEAR, the geographical routing protocol leveraged by 2G. Additionally, simulation results for larger scale networks demonstrate that 2G outperforms GEAR in terms of network lifetime.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Akkaya and M. F. Younis. A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3): 325--349, 2005.
 
2
J. A. Aslam, Q. Li, and D. Rus. Three power-aware routing algorithms for sensor networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 3(2): 187--208, 2003.
 
3
 
4
L. Fang, W. Du, and P. Ning. A beacon-less location discovery scheme for wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM, pages 161--171. IEEE, 2005.
 
5
6
 
7
8
 
9
Crossbow micaz platform, 2008. Accessed in October 2008.
 
10
E. Platon and Y. Sei. Security software engineering in wireless sensor networks. Progress in Informatics, 5(1): 1--19, 2008.
11
12
13
14
 
15
Y. Yu, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Geographical and energy aware routing: A recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks. Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR-01-0023, UCLA Computer Science Department, May 2001.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Neeraj Rajgure: colleagues
Eric Platon: colleagues
Cristian Borcea: colleagues
Shinichi Honiden: colleagues