ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Incorporating accountability into internet email
Full text PdfPdf (364 KB)
Source
Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Computer forensics track table of contents
Pages 875-882  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
Authors
Wayne Liu  Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Sudhir Aggarwal  Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Zhenhai Duan  Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 34,   Downloads (12 Months): 110,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529470
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Email used to be the "number one killer application" of the Internet. However, misuse and abuse such as spam, phishing, and malware attacks have plagued the email systems. Considering deterrence as important as prevention and protection in countering misuse and abuse, we aim to improve the accountability in the email system beyond identification and non-repudiability. Full accountability should be an intrinsic condition for trust, and it constitutes the basis of deterrence against email misuse and abuse. Therefore, we propose to use a layered trust management framework to help email receivers eliminate their unwitting trust and provide them with accountability support. This helps systems to deter misuses and address wrongdoings. By describing and analyzing how our trust management facilitates email accountability, we also show that it can be used to improve the trustworthiness of the Internet services as a whole.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
B. Adida, S. Hohenberger, and R. L. Rivest. Fighting phishing attacks: A lightweight trust architecture for detecting spoofed emails. In USENIX Steps to Reducing Unwanted Traffic on the Internet Workshop (SRUTI), 2005.
3
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Z. Duan, K. Gopalan, and X. Yuan. Behavioral characteristics of spammers and their network reachability properties. In ICC '07. IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 164--171, June 2007.
 
10
C. Ellison. SPKI/SDSI certificates. http://world.std.com/~cme/html/spki.html, January 2004.
 
11
 
12
E. J. Friedman and P. Resnick. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(2): 173--199, 06 2001.
13
 
14
T. Gray. Security in the post-Internet era: The needs of the many vs. the needs of the few. In Security at Line Speed Workshop Findings and Report, November 2003.
 
15
P. Gutmann. Why isn't the internet secure yet, dammit? In AusCERT Asia Pacific Information Technology Security Conference 2004. AusCERT, May 2004.
 
16
G. Hardin. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859): 1243--1248, 1968.
 
17
A. Juels and J. Brainard. Client puzzles: A cryptographic countermeasure against connection depletion attacks. In Proceedings of NDSS '99 (Networks and Distributed Security Systems), pages 151--165, 1999.
18
 
19
R. Levien, L. McCarthy, and M. Blaze. Transparent Internet e-mail security. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/levien96transparent.html.
 
20
21
 
22
 
23
B. Watson. Beyond identity: Addressing problems that persist in an electronic mail system with reliable sender identification. In CEAS 2004 - First Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, Mountain View, CA, USA, July 2004.
 
24
25
26
27

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wayne Liu: colleagues
Sudhir Aggarwal: colleagues
Zhenhai Duan: colleagues