Partitioning web applications between the server and the client

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Partitioning web applications between the server and the client

Full text

Pdf (440 KB)

Source

Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents

Honolulu, Hawaii

SESSION: Web technologies track table of contents

Pages 647-652

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8

Authors

Janne Kuuskeri	Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
Tommi Mikkonen	Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland

Sponsor

SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 33, Downloads (12 Months): 147, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529416 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Web 2.0 and rich Internet application technologies are offering more and more sophisticated means for building compelling applications. At the same time the development of applications is becoming increasingly complex. While web applications are commonly relying on server-side processing, we aim at implementing a "fat client" and running applications mostly on the client. With this in mind we can derive a set of guidelines on how the applications should be partitioned between the server and the client. By following these directives and leaning on the traditional principles of good software development, we can address the issues of complexity that have lately emerged in web development.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	W. W. W. Consortium. Document object model. http://www.w3.org/DOM/, 2004.
	2	W. W. W. Consortium. Html 5. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/, 2008.
	3	D. Crockford. Json. RFC 4627, 2006.
	4	David Flanagan, JavaScript: The Definitive Guide, O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2006
	5	Neal Ford, Art of Java Web Development: Struts, Tapestry, Commons, Velocity, JUnit, Axis, Cocoon, InternetBeans, WebWork, Manning Publications Co., Greenwich, CT, 2003
	6	M. Foundation. The same origin policy. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/components/same-origin.html, 2001.
	7	M. Foundation. Rhino: Javascript for java. http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/, 2008.
	8	M. Foundation. Spidermonkey (javascript-c) engine. http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/, 2008.
	9	J. J. Garrett. Ajax: A new approach to web application. http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/essays/archives/000385.php, 2005.
	10	Google. Google gears. http://gears.google.com/, 2008.
	11	A. T. H. III. Ajax: The Definitive Guide. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2005.
	12	A. Inc. Jaxer. http://aptana.com/jaxer, 2008.
	13	Glenn E. Krasner , Stephen T. Pope, A cookbook for using the model-view controller user interface paradigm in Smalltalk-80, Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, v.1 n.3, p.26-49, Aug./Sept. 1988
	14	Eric A Meyer, CSS: The Definitive Guide, O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2006
	15	T. Mikkonen and A. Taivalsaari. Web applications -- spaghetti code for the 21st century. Technical report, Sun Microsystems, 2007.
	16	Chuck Musciano , Bill Kennedy, HTML (3rd ed.): the definitive guide, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 1998
	17	Erik T. Ray, Learning XML, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 2003
	18	A. Russell. Comet: Low latency data for the browser. http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=545, 2006.
	19	A. Russell. Comet: Low latency data for the browser. http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/wp-content/LowLatencyData.pdf, 2006.
	20	A. Russell, G. Wilkins, D. Davis, and M. Nesbitt. Bayeux protocol. Technical report, The Dojo Foundation, 2007.
	21	A. Taivalsaari, T. Mikkonen, D. Ingalls, and K. Palacz. Web browser as an application platform: The lively kernel experience. Technical report, Sun Microsystems, 2008.
	22	Frank Zammetti, Practical DWR 2 Projects (Practical Projects), 2008
	23	C. Zumbrunn. Helma. http://dev.helma.org/, 2008.