ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Requirements modelling and evaluation for digital preservation: a COTS selection method based on controlled experimentation
Full text PdfPdf (347 KB)
Source
Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
POSTER SESSION: Poster papers table of contents
Pages 401-402  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
Authors
Christoph Becker  Vienna University of Technology, Austria
Andreas Rauber  Vienna University of Technology, Austria
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 65,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529371
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Most methods for the general problem of Commercial-off-the-shelf component selection use goal-oriented requirements modelling and multi-criteria decision making techniques and are applicable across a wide range of domains. This usually implies high levels of complexity. Recently a very specific selection problem emerged in the context of digital preservation. The selection of the most suitable tool to keep a type of digital object alive when the original technical environment ceases to exist is a highly complex domain-specific selection problem with several peculiarities: Highly homogeneous functionality across tools, complex evaluation of quality across settings, and a high need for automation, standardisation, and documentation. This paper describes an evidence-based empirical methodology for COTS component selection in digital preservation through controlled experimentation. We describe the specific selection problem, show how the process of utility analysis can be tailored to fit the problem space and describe the methodology, which is geared towards automated evaluation in an empirical setting. We outline existing tool support and discuss case studies and future directions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
ISO. Open archival information system -- Reference model (ISO 14721: 2003), 2003.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
Weirich, P., Skyrms, B., Adams, E., Binmore, K., Butterfield, J., Diaconis, P., and Harper, W. Decision Space: Multidimensional Utility Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Christoph Becker: colleagues
Andreas Rauber: colleagues