A systematic method for generating quality requirements spectrum

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

A systematic method for generating quality requirements spectrum

Full text

Pdf (236 KB)

Source

Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents

Honolulu, Hawaii

POSTER SESSION: Poster papers table of contents

Pages 399-400

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8

Authors

Shunichi Suzuki	Shinshu University, Japan
Akira Osada	Shinshu University, Japan
Tomonori Sato	Shinshu University, Japan
Haruhiko Kaiya	Shinshu University and GRACE Center NII, Japan
Masaaki Tanigawa	Shinshu University, Japan
Kenji Kaijiri	Shinshu University, Japan

Sponsor

SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a, Downloads (12 Months): n/a, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529370 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Spectrum analysis for quality requirements is useful for measuring and tracking them, but current spectrum analysis largely depends on expertise of each analyst. Therefore, it takes a lot of efforts to perform the analysis and is hard to reuse experiences for such analysis. We introduce domain knowledge called term-characteristic map to improve current spectrum analysis for quality requirements. Through several experiments, we evaluated the improved method for spectrum analysis.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	J. David Blaine , Jane Cleland-Huang, Software Quality Requirements: How to Balance Competing Priorities, IEEE Software, v.25 n.2, p.22-24, March 2008 [doi>10.1109/MS.2008.46]
	2	Istehad Chowdhury , Brian Chan , Mohammad Zulkernine, Security metrics for source code structures, Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on Software engineering for secure systems, p.57-64, May 17-18, 2008, Leipzig, Germany [doi>10.1145/1370905.1370913]
	3	Haruhiko Kaiya , Tomonori Sato , Akira Osada , Naoyuki Kitazawa , Kenji Kaijiri, Toward quality requirements analysis based on domain specific quality spectrum, Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, March 16-20, 2008, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil [doi>10.1145/1363686.1363832]
	4	Ipek Ozkaya , Len Bass , Raghvinder S. Sangwan , Robert L. Nord, Making Practical Use of Quality Attribute Information, IEEE Software, v.25 n.2, p.25-33, March 2008 [doi>10.1109/MS.2008.39]
	5	Yan Zhang , Yi Liu , Le Zhang , Zhiyi Ma , Hong Mei, Modeling and Checking for Non-functional Attributes in Extended UML Class Diagram, Proceedings of the 2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, p.100-107, July 28-August 01, 2008 [doi>10.1109/COMPSAC.2008.72]