Concern-oriented business architecture engineering

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Concern-oriented business architecture engineering

Full text

Pdf (524 KB)

Source

Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents

Honolulu, Hawaii

SESSION: Organizational engineering track table of contents

Pages 265-272

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8

Authors

Stephan Kurpjuweit	University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Robert Winter	University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

Sponsor

SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 12, Downloads (12 Months): 94, Citation Count: 1

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529339 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Organizations are subject to constant evolution and must systematically analyze and design the impact of change to implement it consistently across all organizational domains. A thorough understanding of all relevant business-related artifacts as well as their relationships is a prerequisite to achieve this. For many organizations, business architecture management is a means to ensure the correct and up-to-date documentation of these artifacts. One challenge of business architecture management is the development a company-specific business architecture meta model. Two directions of existing work provide partial solutions: (1) generic (meta) modeling methods and (2) business architecture meta models and languages. We argue that these two approaches complement each other and should be applied in an integrated way. The goal of this contribution is to propose such an integrated approach to business architecture engineering. The development of this approach follows the design research process and is based on experiences gained in three industrial business architecture engineering projects.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Aier, S., Buchs-Herren, N., Saat, J. and Steiner, G. Szenariobasierte Entwicklung der Unternehmensarchitektur bei der Real-Time Center AG. In Proceedings of the DW 2008, (St.Gallen, October 27--28), Gesellschaft für Informatik Köllen, 2008.
	2	Aier, S., Kurpjuweit, S., Schmitz, O., Schulz, J., Thomas, A. and Winter, R. An Engineering Approach to Enterprise Architecture Design and its Application at a Financial Service Provider. Working Paper, Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, June, 2008.
	3	Aier, S., Maletta, F., Riege, C., Stucki, K. and Frank, A. Aufbau und Einsatz der Geschäftsarchitektur bei der AXA Winterthur - Ein minimal invasiver Ansatz. In Proccedings der DW2008, (St. Gallen, October 27--28), Gesellschaft für Informatik Köllen, 2008.
	4	Bayer, J. View-based Software Documentation. PhD. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, 2004.
	5	Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M. and Harmsen, A. F. Meta-Modelling Based Assembly Techniques for Situational Method Engineering. Information Systems, 24, 3 (1999), 209--228.
	6	Emerson, M. and Sztipanovits, J. Techniques for Metamodel Composition. In Proceedings of the 6th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, (Portland, Oregon, USA, October 22--26), 123--139, 2006.
	7	Peter Fettke , Peter Loos, Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2006
	8	IEEE. IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software Intensive Systems (IEEE Std 1471--2000). New York, NY, USA, 2000.
	9	Paul Klint , Ralf Lämmel , Chris Verhoef, Toward an engineering discipline for grammarware, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.14 n.3, p.331-380, July 2005 [doi>10.1145/1072997.1073000]
	10	Gerald Kotonya , Ian Sommerville, Viewpoints for requirements definition, Software Engineering Journal, v.7 n.6, p.375-387, Nov. 1992
	11	Kühn, H., Bayer, F., Junginger, S. and Karagiannis, D. Enterprise Model Integration. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference EC-Web 2003, (Prague, Czech Republic, September 2--5), Springer, 379--392, 2003.
	12	Kurpjuweit, S. and Winter, R. Viewpoint-based Meta Model Engineering. In Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - Concepts and Applications, Proceedings of the 2nd Int'l Workshop EMISA 2007, (St. Goar/Rhine, Germany, October 8), Gesellschaft für Informatik Köllen, 143--161, 2007.
	13	D. W. McDavid, A standard for business architecture description, IBM Systems Journal, v.38 n.1, p.12-31, January 1999
	14	Mendes, R., Mateus, J., Silva, E. and Tribolet, J. Applying Business Process Modeling to Organizational Change. In Proceedings of the 2003 Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), (Tampa, FL, USA, August 4--5), 2003.
	15	Jolita Ralyté , Colette Rolland, An Assembly Process Model for Method Engineering, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, p.267-283, June 04-08, 2001
	16	Ross, J. W., Weill, P. and Robertson, D. C. Enterprise Architecture as Strategy. Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA, 2006.
	17	Rossi, M. and Sein, M. K. Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Approach. 2003. http://tiesrv.hkkk.fi/iris26/presentation/workshop_designRes.pdf, access date: 01.02.2004.
	18	James Rumbaugh , Michael Blaha , William Premerlani , Frederick Eddy , William Lorensen, Object-oriented modeling and design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991
	19	Sutton, S. M. and Rouvellou, I. Issues in the Design and Implementation of a Concern-Space Modeling Schema. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Separation of Concerns in Software Engineering at ICSE 2001, (Toronto, Canada, May 15), 119--124, 2001.
	20	TheOpenGroup The Open Group Architecture Framework TOGAF - 2007 Edition (Incorporating 8.1.1). Van Haren, Zaltbommel, 2007.
	21	van Solingen, R. and Berghout, E. The Goal/Question/Metric Method. McGraw Hill, London, 1999.
	22	André Vasconcelos , Artur Caetano , João Neves , Pedro Sinogas , Ricardo Mendes , José Tribolet, A Framework for Modeling Strategy, Business Processes and Information Systems, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, p.69, September 04-07, 2001
	23	Wegmann, A. The Systemic Enterprise Architecture Methodology (SEAM) - Business and IT Alignment for Competiveness. Technical Report, École Poytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 2002.
	24	Winter, R. and Fischer, R. Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3, 3 (2007), 7--18.