ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
NECTAR: a DTN routing protocol based on neighborhood contact history
Full text PdfPdf (531 KB)
Source
Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Computer networks track table of contents
Pages 40-46  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-166-8
Authors
Etienne C. R. de Oliveira  Universidade Federal Fluminense
Célio V. N. de Albuquerque  Universidade Federal Fluminense
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30,   Downloads (12 Months): 81,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529282.1529290
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There are a number of scenarios where connectivity is intermittent, and a given destination may not be reachable at the moment a message is sent. Networks with these characteristics are known as Delay and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTN). The NECTAR protocol proposed in this article is based on the contacts history in order to create a Neighborhood Index and then determine the most appropriated route for DTNs. Simulations performed with real data retrieved from mobile and wireless environments at Dartmouth College in scenarios where the occurrence of highly-partitioned networks is frequent, and with the presence of resource constrained nodes show that NECTAR is able to deliver more messages than Epidemic and PROPHET protocols with lower consumption of network resources.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
J. Burgess, B. Gallagher, D. Jensen, and B. N. Levine. Maxprop: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, pages 1--11, 2006.
 
3
S. Burleigh, A. Hooke, L. Torgerson, K. Fall, V. Cerf, B. Durst, K. Scott, and H. Weiss. Delay-tolerant networking: an approach to interplanetary internet. IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(6): 128--136, 2003.
 
4
T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. In Proc. IEEE IWCMC, 2(5): 483--502, 2002.
 
5
A. Doria, M. Uden, and D. P. Pandey. Providing connectivity to the saami nomadic community. In Proc. Open Collaborative Design for Sustainable Development, 2002.
6
 
7
D. Kotz, T. Henderson, and I. Abyzov. Downloaded from http://crawdad.cs.dartmouth.edu/dartmouth/campus/syslog/01_04, Dec. 2004.
 
8
J. Leguay, T. Friedman, and V. Conan. Evaluating mobility pattern space routing for DTNs. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, pages 1--10, 2006.
 
9
 
10
A. Lindgren and A. Doria. Probabilistic routing protocol for intermittently connected networks. RFC Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fev 2008.
11
 
12
OLPC. One laptop per child, 2008. Available at: http://laptop.org/.
13
14
15
 
16
UMass. Umass trace repository, 2007. Available at: http://traces.cs.umass.edu/.
 
17
A. Vahdat and D. Becker. Epidemic routing for partially connected ad hoc networks. Technical Report CS-200006, Duke University, April 2000.
 
18
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Etienne C. R. de Oliveira: colleagues
Célio V. N. de Albuquerque: colleagues