ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Selective shielding technique to eliminate crosstalk transitions
Full text PdfPdf (1.04 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 3  (May 2009) table of contents
Article No. 43  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1084-4309
Author
Madhu Mutyam  Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, India
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 86,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1529255.1529265
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

With CMOS process technology scaling to deep submicron level, propagation delay across long on-chip buses is becoming one of the main performance limiting factors in high-performance designs. Propagation delay is very significant when adjacent wires are transitioning in opposite direction as compared to transitioning in the same direction. As opposite transitions on adjacent wires (called as crosstalk transitions) have significant impact on propagation delay, several bus encoding techniques have been proposed in literature to eliminate such transitions.

We propose selective shielding technique to eliminate crosstalk transitions. We show that the selective shielding technique requires ⌈3n/2⌉ wires to encode a n-bit bus. SPICE simulations by considering 90nm technology nodes reveal that, for uniformly distributed random data, our technique achieves nearly 39% (21%) delay savings over 10mm-length uncoded 32-bit bus for pipelined (nonpipelined) data transmission at the cost of nearly 7% energy overhead.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Caignet, F., Delmas-Bendhia, S., and Sicard, E. 2001. The challenge of signal integrity in deep-submicrometer CMOS technology. Proc. IEEE 89, 4, 556--573.
 
3
4
 
5
Khan, Z., Arslan, T., and Erdogan, A. 2004. A dual low power and crosstalk immune encoding scheme for system-on-chip buses. In Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Power and Timing Modeling Optimization and Simulation (PATMOS). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 585--592.
 
6
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
Predictive technology model. http://www.eas.asu.edu/~ptm.
 
13
 
14
Sotiriadis, P. and Chandrakasan, A. 2000. Low power bus coding techniques considering inter-wire capacitances. In Proceedings of the 22nd Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 507--510.
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Sridhara, S. and Shanbhag, N. 2005. Coding for system-on-chip networks: a unified framework. IEEE Trans. VLSI 13, 6, 655--667.
 
19
Stan, M. and Burleson, W. 1994. Limited-weight codes for low power I/O. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Low Power Design. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 209--214.
 
20
 
21
Sylvester, D. and Hu, C. 2001. Analytical modeling and characterization of deep-submicrometer interconnect. Proc. IEEE 89, 5, 634--664.
 
22
 
23
24