|
ABSTRACT
In recent years the discipline of computer science has become recognized as a male dominated field. Attempts have been made to encourage more women to participate but, have such efforts been supported or directed by the available research? This article presents a description of the current situation and reviews the existing body of research related to the undergraduate experience of women in computer science. Based on the research, some implications for computer science education are outlined. Suggestions are also given for further research needed to more completely describe the current situation and direct changes.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Clarke, V. A., & Chambers, S. M. (1989). Gender-based factors in computing enrollments and achievement: Evidence from a study of tertiary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(4), 409-429.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Jagacinski, C. M., LeBold, W. K., & Salvendy, G. (1988). Gender differences in persistence in computer-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 185-202.
|
| |
6
|
Kersteen, Z. A., Linn, M. C., Clancy, M., & Hardyck, C. (1988). Previous experience and the learning of computer programming: The computer helps those who help themselves. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(3), 321-333.
|
| |
7
|
Kramer, P. E., & Lehman, S. (1990), Mismeasuring women: A critique of research on computer ability and avoidance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, 158-172.
|
| |
8
|
Lips, H. M., & Temple, L. (1990). Majoring in computer science: Causal models for women and men. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 99-113.
|
| |
9
|
Miura, I. T. (1987). The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college. Sex Roles, 16(5/6), 303-311.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Rasmussen, B., & Håpnes, T. (1991). Excluding women from the technologies of the future? A case study of the culture of computer science. Futures, 23, 1107-1119.
|
| |
12
|
Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Zubrow, D. (1987). Encountering an alien culture. In S. Kiesler & L. Sproull (Eds.), Computing and change on campus (pp. 173-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
| |
13
|
Sproull, L., Zubrow, D., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Cultural socialization to computing in college. Computers in Human Behavior, 2(4), 257-275.
|
| |
14
|
Teague, J., & Clarke, V. (1991). Fiction and fact: Students' and professionals' perceptions of women in computer science. In A. Lehto and I. Eriksson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Women, Work and Computerization (pp. 377-390). Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Turkle, S. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women's voices: Keeping in touch (pp. 41-61). New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
|
| |
17
|
Ware, N. C., Steckler, N. A., & Leserman, J. (1985). Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major? Journal of Higher Education, 56(1), 73-84.
|
| |
18
|
Widnall, S. E. (1988). AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science, 241, 1740- 1745.
|
|