| Scrolling behaviour with single- and multi-column layout |
| Full text |
Pdf
(2.43 MB)
|
Source
|
International World Wide Web Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web
table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: User interfaces and mobile web/session: user interfaces
table of contents
Pages 831-840
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-487-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
Cameron Braganza
|
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
|
|
Kim Marriott
|
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
|
|
Peter Moulder
|
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
|
|
Michael Wybrow
|
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
|
|
Tim Dwyer
|
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25, Downloads (12 Months): 147, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The standard layout model used by web browsers is to lay text out in a vertical scroll using a single column. The horizontal-scroll layout model--in which text is laid out in columns whose height is set to that of the browser window and the viewer scrolls horizontally - seems well-suited to multi-column layout on electronic devices. We describe a study that examines how people read and, in particular, the strategies they use for scrolling with these two models when reading large textual documents on a standard computer monitor. We compare usability of the models and evaluate both user preferences and the effect of the model on performance. Also interesting is the description of the browser and its user interface which we used for the study.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
J. R. Baker. Is multiple-column online text better? it depends! Usability News, 7, 2005.
|
| |
2
|
R. Bringhurst. The elements of typographic style. Hartley & Marks, 1996.
|
| |
3
|
M. Dyson. How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(6):377--393, 2004.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
M. Dyson and G. Kipping. The legibility of screen formats: Are three columns better than one? Computers & Graphics, 21(6):703--712, 1997.
|
| |
6
|
M. Dyson and G. Kipping. The effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen. Visible Language, 32(2):150--81, 1998.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Matt Jones , Gary Marsden , Norliza Mohd-Nasir , Kevin Boone , George Buchanan, Improving Web interaction on small displays, Proceedings of the eighth international conference on World Wide Web, p.1129-1137, May 1999, Toronto, Canada
|
| |
10
|
J. Nielsen. F-shaped pattern for reading web content. Alertbox: Current Issues in Web Usability (retrieved 31 Oct 2008 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html), April 17, 2006.
|
| |
11
|
M. Schcolnik. A Study of Reading with Dedicated E-Readers. PhD thesis, Nova Southeastern University, 2001.
|
 |
12
|
Evan Schrier , Mira Dontcheva , Charles Jacobs , Geraldine Wade , David Salesin, Adaptive layout for dynamically aggregated documents, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, January 13-16, 2008, Gran Canaria, Spain
[doi> 10.1145/1378773.1378787]
|
| |
13
|
M. Tinker. Legibility of print. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1963.
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
M. Youngman and L. Scharff. Text width and margin width influences. (Presented at the South Western Psychological Assoc.). Retrieved Aug. 10, 2007 from http://hubel.sfasu.edu/research/textmargin.html, 1998.
|
| |
16
|
|
|