ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scrolling behaviour with single- and multi-column layout
Full text PdfPdf (2.43 MB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: User interfaces and mobile web/session: user interfaces table of contents
Pages 831-840  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-487-4
Authors
Cameron Braganza  Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Kim Marriott  Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Peter Moulder  Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Michael Wybrow  Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Tim Dwyer  Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 147,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1526709.1526821
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The standard layout model used by web browsers is to lay text out in a vertical scroll using a single column. The horizontal-scroll layout model--in which text is laid out in columns whose height is set to that of the browser window and the viewer scrolls horizontally - seems well-suited to multi-column layout on electronic devices. We describe a study that examines how people read and, in particular, the strategies they use for scrolling with these two models when reading large textual documents on a standard computer monitor. We compare usability of the models and evaluate both user preferences and the effect of the model on performance. Also interesting is the description of the browser and its user interface which we used for the study.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. R. Baker. Is multiple-column online text better? it depends! Usability News, 7, 2005.
 
2
R. Bringhurst. The elements of typographic style. Hartley & Marks, 1996.
 
3
M. Dyson. How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(6):377--393, 2004.
 
4
 
5
M. Dyson and G. Kipping. The legibility of screen formats: Are three columns better than one? Computers & Graphics, 21(6):703--712, 1997.
 
6
M. Dyson and G. Kipping. The effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen. Visible Language, 32(2):150--81, 1998.
7
8
 
9
 
10
J. Nielsen. F-shaped pattern for reading web content. Alertbox: Current Issues in Web Usability (retrieved 31 Oct 2008 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html), April 17, 2006.
 
11
M. Schcolnik. A Study of Reading with Dedicated E-Readers. PhD thesis, Nova Southeastern University, 2001.
12
 
13
M. Tinker. Legibility of print. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1963.
14
 
15
M. Youngman and L. Scharff. Text width and margin width influences. (Presented at the South Western Psychological Assoc.). Retrieved Aug. 10, 2007 from http://hubel.sfasu.edu/research/textmargin.html, 1998.
 
16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cameron Braganza: colleagues
Kim Marriott: colleagues
Peter Moulder: colleagues
Michael Wybrow: colleagues
Tim Dwyer: colleagues