|
ABSTRACT
Several attempts have been made to analyze customer behavior on online E-commerce sites. Some studies particularly emphasize the social networks of customers. Users' reviews and ratings of a product exert effects on other consumers' purchasing behavior. Whether a user refers to other users' ratings depends on the trust accorded by a user to the reviewer. On the other hand, the trust that is felt by a user for another user correlates with the similarity of two users' ratings. This bidirectional interaction that involves trust and rating is an important aspect of understanding consumer behavior in online communities because it suggests clustering of similar users and the evolution of strong communities. This paper presents a theoretical model along with analyses of an actual online E-commerce site. We analyzed a large community site in Japan: @cosme. The noteworthy characteristics of @cosme are that users can bookmark their trusted users; in addition, they can post their own ratings of products, which facilitates our analyses of the ratings' bidirectional effects on trust and ratings. We describe an overview of the data in @cosme, analyses of effects from trust to rating and vice versa, and our proposition of a measure of community gravity, which measures how strongly a user might be attracted to a community. Our study is based on the @cosme dataset in addition to the Epinions dataset. It elucidates important insights and proposes a potentially important measure for mining online social networks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
E. Adar, L. Zhang, L. Adamic, and R. Lukose. Implicit structure and the dynamics of blogspace. In Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, 2004.
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
S. Brown, A. Tilton, and D. Woodside. The case for on--line communities. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 2002.
|
| |
6
|
C. Forman, A. Ghose, and B. Wiesenfeld. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 2008.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
J. Golbeck. Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2006.
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
R. Guha , Ravi Kumar , Prabhakar Raghavan , Andrew Tomkins, Propagation of trust and distrust, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, May 17-20, 2004, New York, NY, USA
[doi> 10.1145/988672.988727]
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
Jure Leskovec , Lada A. Adamic , Bernardo A. Huberman, The dynamics of viral marketing, Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, p.228-237, June 11-15, 2006, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1134707.1134732]
|
 |
14
|
Jure Leskovec , Lars Backstrom , Ravi Kumar , Andrew Tomkins, Microscopic evolution of social networks, Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, August 24-27, 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1401890.1401948]
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
C. Marlow. Investment and attention in the weblog community. In Proc. HyperText 2006, 2006.
|
| |
17
|
J. McAlexander, J. Schouten, and F. Koenig. Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66:38--54, 2002.
|
| |
18
|
M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, (27):415--444, 2001.
|
| |
19
|
A. Muniz and T. O'Guinn. Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27:412--432, 2001.
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social network analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
|
| |
25
|
|
|