ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Tagommenders: connecting users to items through tags
Full text PdfPdf (1.19 MB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Social networks and web 2.0/session: recommender systems table of contents
Pages: 671-680  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-487-4
Authors
Shilad Sen  Macalester College, St. Paul, MN, USA
Jesse Vig  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
John Riedl  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 42,   Downloads (12 Months): 332,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1526709.1526800
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Tagging has emerged as a powerful mechanism that enables users to find, organize, and understand online entities. Recommender systems similarly enable users to efficiently navigate vast collections of items. Algorithms combining tags with recommenders may deliver both the automation inherent in recommenders, and the flexibility and conceptual comprehensibility inherent in tagging systems. In this paper we explore tagommenders, recommender algorithms that predict users' preferences for items based on their inferred preferences for tags. We describe tag preference inference algorithms based on users' interactions with tags and movies, and evaluate these algorithms based on tag preference ratings collected from 995 MovieLens users. We design and evaluate algorithms that predict users' ratings for movies based on their inferred tag preferences. Our tag-based algorithms generate better recommendation rankings than state-of-the-art algorithms, and they may lead to flexible recommender systems that leverage the characteristics of items users find most important.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
R. Bell and Y. Koren. Lessons from the Netflix prize challenge. 2007.
 
3
J. Bennett and S. Lanning. The Netflix Prize. In Proceedings of KDD Cup and Workshop, 2007.
 
4
5
 
6
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
 
7
J. Diederich and T. Iofciu. Finding Communities of Practice from User Profiles Based On Folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 1st International Worskhop on Building Technology Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice, 2006.
 
8
S. Funk. Netflix Update: Try This At Home. sifter.org/simon/journal/20061211. html, 2006.
 
9
A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin. Bayesian Data Analysis, Second Edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC, July 2003.
 
10
C. Hayes, P. Avesani, and S. Veeramachaneni. An analysis of the use of tags in a blog recommender system. ITC-IRST Technical Report. http://sra.itc.it/people/hayes/pubs/06/hayes-ijcai07-tech-report.pdf, June, 2006.
11
 
12
 
13
14
15
 
16
P. Lamere. Tagomendations -- making recommendations transparent. http://blogs.sun.com/plamere/entry/tagomendations_making_recommedations_transparent, 2007. Retrieved on October 30, 2008.
 
17
 
18
G. MacGregor and E. McCulloch. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library View, 55(5), 2006.
19
 
20
S. Niwa, T. Doi, and S. Hon'Iden. Web Page Recommender System Based on Folksonomy Mining. Transactions of Information Processing Society of Japan, 47(5):1382--1392, 2006.
 
21
 
22
 
23
V. Raghavan and S. Wong. A critical analysis of vector space model for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(5):279--287, 1986.
24
 
25
K. Rose. Digg: Recommendation engine rolling out this week. http://http://blog.digg.com/?p=127, 2008. Retrieved on October 30, 2008.
 
26
J. Schafer, D. Frankowski, J. Herlocker, and S. Sen. Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, 4321:291, 2007.
27
28
29
30
 
31
C. Shirky. Ontology is overrated. http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html, 2005. Retrieved on May 26, 2007.
32


Collaborative Colleagues:
Shilad Sen: colleagues
Jesse Vig: colleagues
John Riedl: colleagues