ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Collective privacy management in social networks
Full text PdfPdf (905 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Security and privacy/session: web privacy table of contents
Pages 521-530  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-487-4
Authors
Anna Cinzia Squicciarini  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Mohamed Shehab  University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
Federica Paci  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 115,   Downloads (12 Months): 370,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1526709.1526780
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Social Networking is one of the major technological phenomena of the Web 2.0, with hundreds of millions of people participating. Social networks enable a form of self expression for users, and help them to socialize and share content with other users. In spite of the fact that content sharing represents one of the prominent features of existing Social Network sites, Social Networks yet do not support any mechanism for collaborative management of privacy settings for shared content. In this paper, we model the problem of collaborative enforcement of privacy policies on shared data by using game theory. In particular, we propose a solution that offers automated ways to share images based on an extended notion of content ownership. Building upon the Clarke-Tax mechanism, we describe a simple mechanism that promotes truthfulness, and that rewards users who promote co-ownership. We integrate our design with inference techniques that free the users from the burden of manually selecting privacy preferences for each picture. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time such a protection mechanism for Social Networking has been proposed. In the paper, we also show a proof-of-concept application, which we implemented in the context of Facebook, one of today's most popular social networks. We show that supporting these type of solutions is not also feasible, but can be implemented through a minimal increase in overhead to end-users.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Acquisti and R. Gross. Imagined communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook. In Proc. of Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pages 36--58. Springer, 2006.
 
2
D. Beaver. 10 billion photos. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=30695603919, October 2008.
 
3
S. P. Borgatti and M. G. Everett. A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 28(4):466--484, October 2006.
 
4
 
5
B. Carminati, E. Ferrari, and A. Perego. Rule-based access control for social networks. In OTM Workshops (2), pages 1734--1744, 2006.
 
6
L. Chen, X. Den, Q. Fang, and F. Tian. Condorcet winners for public goods. In Annals of Operations Research, volume 137, pages 229--242, 2005.
 
7
E. H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. In Public Choice 11, pages 17--33, 1971.
 
8
E. H. Clarke. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods: An example. In Public Price for Public Products, Urban Inst., 1972.
9
 
10
E. Ephrati and J. S. Rosenschein. The Clarke-tax as a consensus mechanism among automated agents. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 173--178, 1991.
 
11
E. Ephrati and J. S. Rosenschein. Voting and multi-agent consensus. 1991.
 
12
 
13
Facebook. Facebook web site. http://www.facebook.com/.
 
14
A. Felt. Defacing Facebook: A security case study.
 
15
A. Felt and D. Evans. Privacy protection for social networking platforms. In Proceedings of Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2008 (in conjunction with 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy), 2008.
 
16
C. Gates. Access control requirements for Web 2.0 Security and Privacy. In IEEE Web 2.0 Privacy and Security Workshop, 2007.
17
 
18
K. K. Gollu, S. Saroiu, and A. Wolman. A social networking-based access control scheme for personal content. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '07)-- Work-in-Progress Session, 2007.
19
20
 
21
M. Hart, R. Johnson, and A. Stent. More content -- less control: Access control in the Web 2.0. In IEEE Web 2.0 Privacy and Security Workshop, 2007.
 
22
G. Hobgen. Security issues and recommendations for online social networks. ENISA Position Paper N. 1, 2007.
 
23
J. Jiang and D. Conrath. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proceedings of ROCLING X, Sep 1997.
 
24
A. Lenhart and M. Madden. Teens, privacy & online social networks. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 18 April 2007.
25
 
26
A. Mas-Colell and M. D. Whinston. Micro-Economic Theory. Chapter 23. Oxford University Press, fourth edition, 1998.
 
27
A. Mathes. Folksonomies: Cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folk%sonomies.html, 2004.
28
29
 
30
C. L. NB Ellison, C Steinfield. Benefits of Facebook 'Friends:' social capital and college students' use of online social network. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication-Electronic, 2007.
 
31
M. E. J. Newman. Scientific collaboration networks. ii. shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1):016132, June 2001.
 
32
 
33
P. Ray. Independence of irrelevant alternatives. In Econometrica, volume 41, pages 987--991, 1973.
 
34
35
 
36
H. R. Varian. System Reliability and Free Riding. In in Economics of Information Security, pages 1--15. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
37
38

Collaborative Colleagues:
Anna Cinzia Squicciarini: colleagues
Mohamed Shehab: colleagues
Federica Paci: colleagues