ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
An axiomatic approach for result diversification
Full text PdfPdf (1.67 MB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Search/session: search UI table of contents
Pages: 381-390  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-487-4
Authors
Sreenivas Gollapudi  Microsoft Research, Mountain View, CA, USA
Aneesh Sharma  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 188,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1526709.1526761
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Understanding user intent is key to designing an effective ranking system in a search engine. In the absence of any explicit knowledge of user intent, search engines want to diversify results to improve user satisfaction. In such a setting, the probability ranking principle-based approach of presenting the most relevant results on top can be sub-optimal, and hence the search engine would like to trade-off relevance for diversity in the results.

In analogy to prior work on ranking and clustering systems, we use the axiomatic approach to characterize and design diversification systems. We develop a set of natural axioms that a diversification system is expected to satisfy, and show that no diversification function can satisfy all the axioms simultaneously. We illustrate the use of the axiomatic framework by providing three example diversification objectives that satisfy different subsets of the axioms. We also uncover a rich link to the facility dispersion problem that results in algorithms for a number of diversification objectives. Finally, we propose an evaluation methodology to characterize the objectives and the underlying axioms. We conduct a large scale evaluation of our objectives based on two data sets: a data set derived from the Wikipedia disambiguation pages and a product database.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
A. Altman and M. Tennenholtz. On the axiomatic foundations of ranking systems. In Proc. 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 917--922, 2005.
 
3
Kenneth Arrow. Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York, 1951.
4
 
5
6
 
7
8
9
10
 
11
R. Hassin, S. Rubinstein, and A. Tamir. Approximation algorithms for maximum dispersion. Operations Research Letters, 21(3):133--137, 1997.
 
12
J. Kleinberg. An Impossibility Theorem for Clustering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference, 2003.
 
13
B. Korte and D. Hausmann. An Analysis of the Greedy Heuristic for Independence Systems. Algorithmic Aspects of Combinatorics, 2:65--74, 1978.
 
14
SS Ravi, D.J. Rosenkrantz, and G.K. Tayi. Facility dispersion problems: Heuristics and special cases. Proc. 2nd Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS), pages 355--366, 1991.
 
15
S.S. Ravi, D.J. Rosenkrantz, and G.K. Tayi. Heuristic and special case algorithms for dispersion problems. Operations Research, 42(2):299--310, 1994.
 
16
SS Ravi, D.J. Rosenkrantzt, and G.K. Tayi. Approximation Algorithms for Facility Dispersion. In Teofilo F. Gonzalez, editor, Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007.
 
17
18
 
19
E. Vee, U. Srivastava, J. Shanmugasundaram, P. Bhat, and S.A. Yahia. Efficient Computation of Diverse Query Results. IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering, 2008. ICDE 2008, pages 228--236, 2008.
 
20
ChengXiang Zhai. Risk Minimization and Language Modeling in Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
21
 
22
23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sreenivas Gollapudi: colleagues
Aneesh Sharma: colleagues