| Click chain model in web search |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.20 MB)
|
Source
|
International World Wide Web Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web
table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Data mining/session: click models
table of contents
Pages 11-20
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-487-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
Fan Guo
|
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
|
Chao Liu
|
Microsoft Research Redmond, Redmond, WA, USA
|
|
Anitha Kannan
|
Microsoft Research Search Labs, Mountain View, CA, USA
|
|
Tom Minka
|
Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
|
|
Michael Taylor
|
Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
|
|
Yi-Min Wang
|
Microsoft Research Redmond, Redmond, WA, USA
|
|
Christos Faloutsos
|
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 46, Downloads (12 Months): 208, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Given a terabyte click log, can we build an efficient and effective click model? It is commonly believed that web search click logs are a gold mine for search business, because they reflect users' preference over web documents presented by the search engine. Click models provide a principled approach to inferring user-perceived relevance of web documents, which can be leveraged in numerous applications in search businesses. Due to the huge volume of click data, scalability is a must. We present the click chain model (CCM), which is based on a solid, Bayesian framework. It is both scalable and incremental, perfectly meeting the computational challenges imposed by the voluminous click logs that constantly grow. We conduct an extensive experimental study on a data set containing 8.8 million query sessions obtained in July 2008 from a commercial search engine. CCM consistently outperforms two state-of-the-art competitors in a number of metrics, with over 9.7% better log-likelihood, over 6.2% better click perplexity and much more robust (up to 30%) prediction of the first and the last clicked position.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
Nick Craswell , Onno Zoeter , Michael Taylor , Bill Ramsey, An experimental comparison of click position-bias models, Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining, February 11-12, 2008, Palo Alto, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1341531.1341545]
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
Thorsten Joachims , Laura Granka , Bing Pan , Helene Hembrooke , Geri Gay, Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback, Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 15-19, 2005, Salvador, Brazil
[doi> 10.1145/1076034.1076063]
|
 |
10
|
Thorsten Joachims , Laura Granka , Bing Pan , Helene Hembrooke , Filip Radlinski , Geri Gay, Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.25 n.2, p.7-es, April 2007
[doi> 10.1145/1229179.1229181]
|
| |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
Gui-Rong Xue , Hua-Jun Zeng , Zheng Chen , Yong Yu , Wei-Ying Ma , WenSi Xi , WeiGuo Fan, Optimizing web search using web click-through data, Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, November 08-13, 2004, Washington, D.C., USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031171.1031192]
|
|