|
ABSTRACT
This describes enhancements to provide more advanced computer-assisted analysis of instances of linear programming models. Three categories of enhancements are described: views, engines for obtaining information, and rule-based advising. Examples of their uses include redundancy and infeasiblity diagnoses.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
BAKER, T. E. RESULT: An interactive modeling system for planning and scheduling. Presented at the ORSA/TIMS meeting (Chicago, IL, 1983).
|
| |
2
|
BROOKE, A., KENDRICK, D., AND MEERAUS, A. GAMS: A User's Guide. Scientific Press, Redwood City, Calif., 1988.
|
| |
3
|
Chesapeake Decision Sciences. MIMI/LP User Manual. New Providence, NJ, 1988.
|
| |
4
|
CHINNECK, J.W. Localizing and diagnosing infeasibilities in networks. Tech. Rep. SCE~90- 14, Dept. of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Canada, 1990. To appear in ORSA J. on Comput.
|
| |
5
|
CmNNECK, J. W. Formulating processing network models: Viability theory. Naval Res. Logistics 37, (1990), 245-261.
|
| |
6
|
GREENBERG, H. J. A New Approach to Analyze Information Contained in a Model. In Energy Models Validation and Assessment, S. 1. Gass, Ed., NBS Pub. 569, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Md., 1978, 517-524.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
GREENBER~, H.J. ANALYZE: A computer-assisted analysis system for linear programming models. Oper. Res. Lett. 6, 5 (1987), 249-255.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
GREENBERG, H.J. Computer-assisted analysis for diagnosing infeasible or unbounded linear programs. Math. Program. Stud. 31, (1987), 79-97.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
GREENBERG, H J. Modeltng by Object-Driven Lznear Elemental Relations: A User's Guide for MODLER. Kluwer, Boston, Mass., 1993.
|
| |
14
|
GREENBERG, H.J. An empirical analysis of infeasibihty diagnosis for instances of linear programming blending models. 1MA J. Math. Bus. Ind~Js. 4 (1992), 163-210.
|
| |
15
|
GREENBERG, H. J., LUNDGREN~ J. R., AND MAYB~;E, J. $. Graph theoretic methods for the qualitative analysis of rectangular matrices. SIAM J. Algebraic D~screte Methods 2, (1981), 221-239.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
GREEN~ERG, H. J., AND MURPHY, F. H. Approaches to diagnosing infeasibility for linear programs, ORSA J. Comput. 3, 3 (1991), 253-261.
|
| |
18
|
GREENBERG, 1/. J., AND MURPHY, F. H. Views of mathematical programming models and their instances, Tech. Rep., Mathematics Dept., Univ. of Colorado at Denver, Denver, Colo., 1991.
|
| |
19
|
MathPro, Inc. MathPro Usage Guide: Introduction and Reference. Washington, D.C., 1989.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
SCHRAGE, L. User's Manual for LINDO. Scientific Press, Palo Alto, Calif., 1981.
|
| |
22
|
|
CITED BY 3
|
|
Hamid R. Nemati , David M. Steiger , Lakshmi S. Iyer , Richard T. Herschel, Knowledge warehouse: an architectural integration of knowledge management, decision support, artificial intelligence and data warehousing, Decision Support Systems, v.33 n.2, p.143-161, June 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVIEW
"Joseph M. Lambert : Reviewer"
Greenberg continues to report on the ANALYZE package, which he
first developed in 1983. This paper details the increased flexibility
for viewing a model instance. For example, the commands LIST and DISPLAY
have been extended and present the ne
more...
|