ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Decentralized control of adaptive sampling in wireless sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (3.38 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 3  (May 2009) table of contents
Article No. 19  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Johnsen Kho  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Alex Rogers  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Nicholas R. Jennings  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 94,   Downloads (12 Months): 392,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1525856.1525857
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The efficient allocation of the limited energy resources of a wireless sensor network in a way that maximizes the information value of the data collected is a significant research challenge. Within this context, this article concentrates on adaptive sampling as a means of focusing a sensor's energy consumption on obtaining the most important data. Specifically, we develop a principled information metric based upon Fisher information and Gaussian process regression that allows the information content of a sensor's observations to be expressed. We then use this metric to derive three novel decentralized control algorithms for information-based adaptive sampling which represent a trade-off in computational cost and optimality. These algorithms are evaluated in the context of a deployed sensor network in the domain of flood monitoring. The most computationally efficient of the three is shown to increase the value of information gathered by approximately 83%, 27%, and 8% per day compared to benchmarks that sample in a naïve nonadaptive manner, in a uniform nonadaptive manner, and using a state-of-the-art adaptive sampling heuristic (USAC) correspondingly. Moreover, our algorithm collects information whose total value is approximately 75% of the optimal solution (which requires an exponential, and thus impractical, amount of time to compute).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Cardell-Oliver, R., Smettem, K., Kranz, M., and Mayer, K. 2005. A reactive soil moisture sensor network: Design and field evaluation. Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw. 1, 2 (Apr.--June), 149--162.
 
4
Chen, C. S., Kang, M. S., Hwang, J. C., and Huang, C. W. 2000. Application of binary integer programming for load transfer of distribution systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Power System Technology (PowerCon) . Vol. 1. 305--310.
 
5
Chevaleyre, Y., Dunne, P., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Lemaitre, M., Maudet, N., Padget, J., Phelps, S., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J., and Sousa, P. 2006. Issues in multiagent resource allocation. Informatica 30, 3--31.
 
6
 
7
Chu, M., Haussecker, H., and Zhao, F. 2002. Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks. Int. J. High Perf. Comput. Appl. 16, 3, 293--313.
 
8
Cressie, N. A. C. 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons.
9
 
10
De Roure, D. 2005. Floodnet: A new flood warning system. Ingenia 23, 49--51.
 
11
 
12
Frieden, B. 2004. Science from Fisher Information: A Unification. Cambridge University Press.
 
13
Girard, A. 2004. Approximate methods for propagation of uncertainty with Gaussian process models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
14
15
 
16
Heeks, R. 1999. Centralised versus decentralised management of public information systems: A core-periphery solution. Tech. rep., Institute of Development Policy and Management, Paper 7, Manchester, UK.
17
 
18
19
 
20
Kroc, S. and Delic, V. 2003. Personal wireless sensor network for mobile health care monitoring. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS). Vol. 2. 471--474.
21
 
22
Lo, B. P. L. and Yang, G. Z. 2005. Key technical challenges and current implementations of body sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN). 1--5.
 
23
Mackay, D. J. C. 1998. Introduction to Gaussian process. In Proceedings of Neural Networks and Machine Learning. 133--165.
 
24
25
 
26
Makarenko, A. and Durrant-Whyte, H. 2004. Decentralized data fusion and controls in active sensor network. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION). Stockholm, Sweden, 479--486.
 
27
28
 
29
Padhy, P., Martinez, K., Riddoch, A., Hart, J. K., and Ong, R. 2005. Glacial environment monitoring using sensor networks. In Proceedings of Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN). 10--14.
 
30
Rabinowitz, P. and Davis, P. J. 2006. Methods of Numerical Integration, 2nd Ed. Dover Publications.
 
31
Rahimi, M., Pon, R., Kaiser, W. J., Sukhatme, G. S., Estrin, D., and Srivastava, M. 2004. Adaptive sampling for environmental robotics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Vol. 4. 3537--3544.
 
32
Rasmussen, C. E. 2004. Gaussian processes in machine learning. AI 3176, 63--71.
 
33
 
34
Seeger, M. 2004. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Int. J. Neural Sys. 14, 2 69--106.
 
35
36
 
37
Yong, B. C., Kurokawa, T., Takefuji, Y., and Hwa, S. K. 1993. An o(1) approximate parallel algorithm for the n-task-n-person assignment problem. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). Vol. 2. 1503--1506.
 
38

Collaborative Colleagues:
Johnsen Kho: colleagues
Alex Rogers: colleagues
Nicholas R. Jennings: colleagues