ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Understanding teamwork in high-risk domains through analysis of errors
Full text PdfPdf (743 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 2 table of contents
Pages 4651-4656  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
Author
Aleksandra Sarcevic  Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520340.1520715
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Trauma care is an example of dynamic, complex, and safety-critical teamwork. The staff in trauma centers works under time pressure and lacks effective information technologies to support teamwork and reduce errors. This work presents a qualitative study that looked at the teamwork errors and their causes to better understand the challenges in providing computerized support for this user group.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
American College of Surgeons, Advanced Trauma Life Support® (ATLS®), 7th Edition, Chicago, IL, 2005.
2
 
3
Clarke, J.R., Spejewski, B., Gertner, A.S., Webber, B. L., Hayward, C.Z., Santora, T.A., et al. An objective analysis of process errors in trauma resuscitations. Acad. Emergency Medicine, 7, 11 (2000), 1303--1310.
 
4
Gruen, R.L., Jurkovich, G.J., McIntyre, L.K., Foy, H.M., and Maier, R.V. Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: Lessons learned from 2594 deaths. Annals of Surgery, 244, 3 (2006), 371--380.
 
5
Hastie, R., and Dawes, R. M. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2001.
 
6
Johnson, C. W. Why human error modeling has failed to help systems development. Interacting with Computers, 11, 5, (1999), 517--524.
 
7
Rasmussen, J. Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13, 3 (1983), 257--266.
 
8
Reason, J.T. Human Error, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
 
9
Sasoua, K., and Reason, J.T. Team errors: Definition and taxonomy. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 65, 1 (1999), 1--9.
 
10
Trepess, D., and Stockman, T. A classification and analysis of erroneous actions in computer supported co-operative work environment. Interacting with Computers, 11, 5 (1999), 611--622.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Aleksandra Sarcevic: colleagues