Enhancing input device evaluation: longitudinal approaches

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present our experiences with longitudinal study designs for input device evaluation. In this domain, analyzing learning is currently the main reason for applying longitudinal designs. We will shortly discuss related research questions and outline two case studies in which we used different approaches to address this issue. Finally, we will point out future research tasks in the context of longitudinal evaluation methods.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bieg, H.-J. (2008). Laserpointer and eye gaze interaction -- design and evaluation. Master's thesis, University of Konstanz, 2008. http://hci.uni-konstanz.de/intehrdis/Bieg2008.pdf
• 2: Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys, and Text Keys for Text Selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21(8), 601--613.
• 4: Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381--391.
• 5: Gonzáles, V. and Kobsa, A (2003). A workplace study of the adoption of information visualization systems. In Proceedings of I-KNOW'03, Graz, Austria, p92--102.
• 6: Jesper Kjeldskov , Mikael B. Skov , Jan Stage, Does time heal?: a longitudinal study of usability, Proceedings of the 17th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Citizens Online: Considerations for Today and the Future, November 21-25, 2005, Canberra, Australia
• 7: König, W.A.,Bieg,H.-J., Schmidt, T., Reiterer, H. (2007). Position--independent interaction for large high-resolution displays. In Proc. IHCI'07, 2007.
• 8: I. Scott MacKenzie , Aleks Oniszczak, A comparison of three selection techniques for touchpads, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.336-343, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/274644.274691]
• 9: I. Scott MacKenzie , Shawn X. Zhang, The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.25-31, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.302983]
• 10: Brad A. Myers , Rishi Bhatnagar , Jeffrey Nichols , Choon Hong Peck , Dave Kong , Robert Miller , A. Chris Long, Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503383]
• 11: Purvi Saraiya , Chris North , Karen Duca, An Evaluation of Microarray Visualization Tools for Biological Insight, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, p.1-8, October 10-12, 2004 [doi>10.1109/INFOVIS.2004.5]
• 12: Taris, Toon W. (2000). A Primer in longitudinal data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Input devices and strategies (e.g., mouse, touchscreen)

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
evaluation, laser-pointer, longitudinal data, pointing device, retention task, transfer task