| Using language tests and emotional expressions to determine the learnability of artificial languages |
| Full text |
Pdf
(793 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems
table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1
table of contents
Pages 4075-4080
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
Omar Mubin
|
Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
|
|
Suleman Shahid
|
Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
|
|
Christoph Bartneck
|
Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
|
|
Emiel Krahmer
|
Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
|
|
Marc Swerts
|
Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
|
|
Loe Feijs
|
Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9, Downloads (12 Months): 62, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The study described hereunder lies within the context of a larger project focusing on the design and implementation of a "Robotic Interaction Language". The research goal of this project is to find the right balance between the effort necessary from the user to learn a new or artificial language and the resulting benefit of robust communication between a robot and the user as a direct consequence of optimized speech recognition. To measure the first criteria we have explored two methods to evaluate language learnability, namely Language Tests and analyzing expressed emotions during interaction in an artificial language. Our results indicate that both have potential in being used as measurement tools for evaluating the learnability of artificial languages.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Toki Pona. http://www.tokipona.org/.
|
| |
4
|
The Klingon Language Institute. http://www.kli.org/.
|
| |
5
|
Lupyan, G. and Christiansen, M. Case, word order, and language learnability: insights from connectionist modeling. 2002.
|
| |
6
|
Carroll, J., Sapon, S. and Corporation, P. Modern language aptitude test. Psychological Co New York, 1959.
|
| |
7
|
Parry, T. and Child, J. Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship between VORD, MLAT and Language Proficiency. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Language Aptitude Testing, 1990. Prentice Hall, 30--67.
|
| |
8
|
Grigornko, E., Sternberg, R. and Ehrman, M. A Theory-Based Approach to the Measurement of Foreign Language Learning Ability: The Canal-F Theory and Test. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 3 2000, 390--405.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Ladefoged, P. and Maddieson, I. The Sounds of the World's Languages. Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
|
| |
11
|
Breugelmans, S. and Poortinga, Y. Emotion Without a Word: Shame and Guilt Among Raramuri Indians and Rural Javanese. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 6 2006, 1111--1122.
|
| |
12
|
Alderson, J., Clapham, C. and Wall, D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
|
|