ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Tracking behavior in persuasive apps: is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting?
Full text PdfPdf (4.32 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1 table of contents
Pages 4045-4050  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
Authors
Miyuki Shiraishi  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Yasuyuki Washio  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Chihiro Takayama  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Vili Lehdonvirta  Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, Espoo, Finland
Hiroaki Kimura  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Tatsuo Nakajima  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520340.1520615
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to discuss the roles for the two types of tracking user behavior. Considering these two types of tracking, sensor based recognition has a great advantage when sensing human activity, but it is not always adequate when tracking in the real world. In this paper, we compare the benefits and drawbacks of sensor-based tracking versus self-reported data in persuasive applications called EcoIsland.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Schechtner, K., Schrom-Feiertag, H. Understanding and influencing spatiotemporal visitor movement in national parks based on static and dynamic sensor data. In Pervasive 2008 Workshop Proceedings, pp.95--99, 2008.
 
3
Dillahunt, T., Becker, G., Mankoff, J., Kraut, R. Motivating environmentally sustainable behavior changes with a virtual polar bear. In Pervasive 2008 Workshop Proceedings, pp.58--62, 2008
 
4
Strengers, Y. Challenging comfort & cleanliness norms through interactive in--home feedback systems. In Pervasive 2008 Workshop Proceedings, Sydney, Australia, May 19--22. (2008) 104--108

Collaborative Colleagues:
Miyuki Shiraishi: colleagues
Yasuyuki Washio: colleagues
Chihiro Takayama: colleagues
Vili Lehdonvirta: colleagues
Hiroaki Kimura: colleagues
Tatsuo Nakajima: colleagues