| Product interest and engagement scale, beta (pies-beta): initial development |
| Full text |
Pdf
(854 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems
table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1
table of contents
Pages 3913-3918
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
Christopher N. Chapman
|
Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA
|
|
Michal Lahav
|
Sakson & Taylor, Seattle, WA, USA
|
|
Edwin Love
|
Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, USA
|
|
James L. Alford
|
Volt Information Sciences, Redmond, WA, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 35, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We report a work in progress: development and initial validation of the Product Interest and Engagement Scale (PIES), a short assessment instrument measuring consumer interest in technology products. PIES reflects an explicitly multidimensional, hierarchical, and extensible model of product interest. It assesses consumer product interest in terms of an overall interest scale plus three subscales assessing interest in features and choices, personal image as affected by a product, and interest in optimizing one's choice with regards to a product. We report factor structure in a sample of N=225 US consumers and replication with N=180 US consumers. The results establish reliability of the overall 12-item scale and subscales in a broad consumer sample (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89 overall, 0.82-0.88 for subscales). Validity measures in the validation sample demonstrate convergent and discriminant validity with product ownership and product involvement measures. We regard PIES as currently being in beta form (PIES-beta). It is suitable for usage now but will undergo further revision in 2009.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Bernaards, C.A. and Jennrich, R. I. (2005) Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement: 65, 676--696, 2005.
|
| |
2
|
Fox, J. sem: Structural equation models. R package ver. 0.9-14. http://www.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/, 2008.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Kline, R.B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed). Guilford, 2004.
|
| |
5
|
R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org, 2008.
|
| |
6
|
Raiche, G. nFactors: Non-graphical solution to the Cattell scree test. R package ver. 2.1, 2007.
|
| |
7
|
Revelle, W. psych: Procedures for personality, psychometric, and psychological research. R package ver. 1.0-58, http://personality-project.org/r, 2008.
|
| |
8
|
Worthington, R.L. & Whittaker, T.A. Scale development research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806--838, 2006.
|
| |
9
|
Zaichkowsky, J.L. Measuring the involvement construct. J. of Consumer Research, 12, 341--352, 1985.
|
| |
10
|
Zaichkowsky, J.L., The personal involvement inventory -- reduction, revision, and application to advertising, J. of Advertising, 23:4, 59--70, 1994.
|
| |
11
|
Zins, A.H., and Bauernfiend, U. Explaining online purchase planning experiences with recommender websites. In Frew, A.J. (ed), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2005, Springer, 2005.
|
|