ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Micro-blogging as online word of mouth branding
Full text PdfPdf (762 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1 table of contents
Pages 3859-3864  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
Authors
Bernard J. Jansen  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Mimi Zhang  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Kate Sobel  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, CA, USA
Abdur Chowdury  Twitter, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 116,   Downloads (12 Months): 566,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520340.1520584
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we report research results investigating micro-blogging as a form of online word of mouth branding. We analyzed 149,472 micro-blog postings containing branding comments, sentiments, and opinions. We investigated the overall structure of these micro-blog postings, types of expressions, and sentiment fluctuations. Of the branding micro-blogs, nearly 20 percent contained some expressions of branding sentiments. Of these tweets with sentiments, more than 50 percent were positive and 33 percent critical of the company or product. We discuss the implications for organizations in using micro-blogging as part of their overall marketing strategy and branding campaigns.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, E. W. Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1, 1 1998), 5--17.
 
2
Helps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D. and Raman, N. Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 44, 2 2004), 333--348.
 
3
Ha, H.-Y. The effects of consumer risk perception on pre-purchase information in online auctions: Brand, word-of-mouth, and customized information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, 1 2006).
 
4
 
5
 
6
Davenport, T. H. and Beck, J. C. The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA., 2002.
7
 
8
Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M. and Wu, F. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Social Computing Laboratory, HP Labs 2008.
 
9
Milstein, S., Chowdhury, A., Hochmuth, G., Lorica, B. and Magoulas, R. Twitter and the micro--messaging revolution: Communication, connections, and immediacy -- 140 characters at a time. O'Reilly Media, 2008.
 
10
Fehr, E. and Falk, A. Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review, 46, 4 2002), 687--724.
 
11
Kimmel, A. J. Rumors and rumor control: A manager's guide to understanding and combatting rumors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwak, New Jersey, 2004.
 
12
Richins, M. L. Negative word-of mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47, Winter 1983), 68 -- 78.
 
13
Benedicktus, R. L. and Andrews, M. L. Building trust with consensus information: The effects of valence and sequence direction Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 2 2006), http://www.jiad.org/article77.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Bernard J. Jansen: colleagues
Mimi Zhang: colleagues
Kate Sobel: colleagues
Abdur Chowdury: colleagues