| Intermediated technology interaction in rural contexts |
| Full text |
Mov
(1:18),
Pdf
(891 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems
table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1
table of contents
Pages 3817-3822
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
Abhay Sukumaran
|
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
|
|
Satyan Ramlal
|
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
|
Eyal Ophir
|
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
|
|
Vangala RamNaresh Kumar
|
ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
|
|
Gaurav Mishra
|
ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
|
|
Vanessa Evers
|
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
|
Venkataraman Balaji
|
ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
|
|
Clifford Nass
|
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 63, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Access to information technology in developing countries is often indirect, involving human intermediaries. A computer kiosk is a typical instance of three-way interaction between user, kiosk operator, and kiosk technology. We describe a pilot experimental study that investigates whether manipulating the social prominence of the intermediary versus the technology affects perceived information characteristics and attitudes toward the interaction. We suggest that a better understanding of such locally specific interaction models is needed to address culturally influenced issues in information technology use throughout the developing world. Ongoing methodological challenges in conducting experimental studies in such contexts are discussed.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Greenfield, P. You can't take it with you: Why ability assessments don't cross cultures. American Psychologist 52, 10 (1997), 1115--1124.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (1994), 949--971.
|
| |
6
|
Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. Eastern and Western perceptions of causality for social behavior: Lay theories about personalities and social situations. In D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides; Understanding and overcoming group conflict (1999) 239--273. New York: Sage.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The media equation. Stanford, CSLI Publications, 1996.
|
| |
9
|
Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., and Leavitt, C. The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response. Journal of Consumer Research 4 (1978), 252--260.
|
| |
10
|
Swaminathan, M.S., Two Missions for the 60th anniversary. The Hindu (2007). Available from: http://www.thehindu.com/2007/07/28/stories/2007072854961200.htm
|
|