ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Intermediated technology interaction in rural contexts
Full text MovMov (1:18),  PdfPdf (891 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1 table of contents
Pages 3817-3822  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
Authors
Abhay Sukumaran  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Satyan Ramlal  University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Eyal Ophir  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Vangala RamNaresh Kumar  ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
Gaurav Mishra  ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
Vanessa Evers  University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Venkataraman Balaji  ICRISAT, Patancheru, India
Clifford Nass  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520340.1520577
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Access to information technology in developing countries is often indirect, involving human intermediaries. A computer kiosk is a typical instance of three-way interaction between user, kiosk operator, and kiosk technology. We describe a pilot experimental study that investigates whether manipulating the social prominence of the intermediary versus the technology affects perceived information characteristics and attitudes toward the interaction. We suggest that a better understanding of such locally specific interaction models is needed to address culturally influenced issues in information technology use throughout the developing world. Ongoing methodological challenges in conducting experimental studies in such contexts are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Greenfield, P. You can't take it with you: Why ability assessments don't cross cultures. American Psychologist 52, 10 (1997), 1115--1124.
 
4
 
5
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (1994), 949--971.
 
6
Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. Eastern and Western perceptions of causality for social behavior: Lay theories about personalities and social situations. In D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides; Understanding and overcoming group conflict (1999) 239--273. New York: Sage.
 
7
 
8
Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The media equation. Stanford, CSLI Publications, 1996.
 
9
Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., and Leavitt, C. The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response. Journal of Consumer Research 4 (1978), 252--260.
 
10
Swaminathan, M.S., Two Missions for the 60th anniversary. The Hindu (2007). Available from: http://www.thehindu.com/2007/07/28/stories/2007072854961200.htm

Collaborative Colleagues:
Abhay Sukumaran: colleagues
Satyan Ramlal: colleagues
Eyal Ophir: colleagues
Vangala RamNaresh Kumar: colleagues
Gaurav Mishra: colleagues
Vanessa Evers: colleagues
Venkataraman Balaji: colleagues
Clifford Nass: colleagues