| Information foraging in E-voting |
| Full text |
Pdf
(824 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems
table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1
table of contents
Pages 3799-3804
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12, Downloads (12 Months): 70, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we present a case study of human-information interaction in the online realm of politics. The case study consists of a participant observed while searching and browsing the internet for campaign information in a mock-voting situation while taking notes that were to be shared with others. Interaction analysis of the case study data consisted of applying Information Foraging Theory to understand participant specific behaviors in searching and browsing. Case study results show skewed time allocation to activities, a tradeoff between enrichment vs. exploitation of search results, and issues with lack of scent, low value perception, and value depletion of information. Potential implications for voter-centered design of e-voting portals are discussed and future work is outlined.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
William Jones , Peter Pirolli , Stuart K. Card , Raya Fidel , Nahum Gershon , Peter Morville , Bonnie Nardi , Daniel M. Russell, "It's about the information stupid!": why we need a separate field of human-information interaction, CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/1125451.1125469]
|
| |
2
|
Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. 1995. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4 (1). 39--103.
|
| |
3
|
Pirolli, P. and Card, S. 1999. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106 (4). 643--675.
|
| |
4
|
Raine, L., Horrigan, J. and Cornfield, M. The internet and campaign 2004, Pew Internet and American Life project Report, Washington, DC, 2005, Available at http:// www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_2004_Campaign.pdf.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Robertson, S.P., Vatrapu, R. and Abraham, G., 2009. Note Taking and Note Sharing While Browsing Campaign Information. in 42th Hawai'i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-40), January 5--8, 2009, (Big Island,Hawai`i, 2009), (CD-ROM).
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Smith, A. and Rainie, L. 2008. The internet and the 2008 election. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_2008_ election.pdf.
|
| |
10
|
Vatrapu, R., Robertson, S. and Dissanayake, W. 2008. Are Political Weblogs Public Spheres or Partisan Spheres? International Reports on Socio-Informatics, 5 (1). 7--26.
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.3
Group and Organization Interfaces
Subjects:
Theory and models
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.1
MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
H.1.2
User/Machine Systems
Subjects:
Human information processing
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.3
Group and Organization Interfaces
Subjects:
Evaluation/methodology;
Asynchronous interaction;
Collaborative computing
General Terms:
Design,
Experimentation,
Human Factors,
Theory
Keywords:
comparative informatics,
e-democracy,
e-participation,
e-voting,
information foraging theory,
information patch,
information scent,
participatory design,
voter-centered design,
www.votesby.us
|