ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A biologically inspired approach to learning multimodal commands and feedback for human-robot interaction
Full text FlvFlv (2:27),  Mp4Mp4 (2:27),  PdfPdf (1.26 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Spotlight on work in progress session 1 table of contents
Pages 3553-3558  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
Authors
Anja Austermann  The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Tokyo, Japan
Seiji Yamada  National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 227,   Downloads (12 Months): 253,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520340.1520533
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe a method to enable a robot to learn how a user gives commands and feedback to it by speech, prosody and touch. We propose a biologically inspired approach based on human associative learning. In the first stage, which corresponds to the stimulus encoding in natural learning, we use unsupervised training of HMMs to model the incoming stimuli. In the second stage, the associative learning, these models are associated with a meaning using an implementation of classical conditioning. Top-down processing is applied to take into account the context as a bias for the stimulus encoding. In an experimental study we evaluated the learning of user feedback with our learning method using special training tasks, which allow the robot to explore and provoke situated feedback from the user. In this first study, the robot learned to discriminate between positive and negative feedback with an average accuracy of 95.97%.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Austermann, S. Yamada: ""Good Robot, Bad Robot" -- Analzying User's Feedback in a Human-Robot Teaching Task", In Proc. of the RO--MAN 2008, 41--46
 
2
D. Groome: An Introduction to Cognitive Psychology. Psychology Press, Second Edition, 2008
 
3
N. Iwahashi: "Robots that learn language --Developmental Approach to Human-Machine Conversations" Proc. EELC 2006, 142--179, 2006.
 
4
T. L. Nwe, S. Foo, S. Wei; L. De Silva, "Speech emotion recognition. using hidden Markov models", Speech communication 41,4, 2003
 
5
R. Rescorla, A. Wagner: "A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.", Classical Conditioning II, Appleton Century Crofts, 64--99, 1972
 
6
Kim, B. Scassellati, "Learning to Refine Behavior Using Prosodic Feedback", In Proc. of the ICDL 2007, pp. 205--210
 
7
The Julius Speech Recognition Project: http://julius.sourceforge.jp

Collaborative Colleagues:
Anja Austermann: colleagues
Seiji Yamada: colleagues