| An evaluation of techniques for selecting moving targets |
| Full text |
Mov
(2:31),
Pdf
(655 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems
table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Student research competition
table of contents
Pages 3329-3334
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-247-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12, Downloads (12 Months): 62, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Moving targets are found in numerous applications such as computer games, air traffic control systems, and video surveillance. The selection of moving targets is considerably more difficult and error prone than traditional stationary target selection. In this paper, we introduce Comet Tails and Target Lock, two techniques that support the selection of moving targets. Our goal is to facilitate accurate and fast selection of moving targets. We compare our two techniques to unassisted selection in a controlled experiment. The results show that for moving target selection, Comet Tails and Target Lock can outperform unassisted selection, and result in fewer errors. According to post-experiment questionnaires, participants indicate a stronger preference for assisted target selection with Comet Tails and Target Lock than unassisted selection.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Fitts, P. M. (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47:381--391.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Hoffmann, E. R. (1991) Capture of moving targets: A modification of Fitts' law. Ergonomics, 34, 211--220.
|
| |
5
|
Jagacinski, R. J., Repperger, D. W., Ward, S. L., & Moran, M. S. (1980) A test of Fitts' law with moving targets. Human Factors, 22, 225--233.
|
| |
6
|
|
|