|
ABSTRACT
A long-standing goal of Web research has been to construct a unified Web knowledge base. Information extraction techniques have shown good results on Web inputs, but even most domain-independent ones are not appropriate for Web-scale operation. In this paper we describe three recent extraction systems that can be operated on the entire Web (two of which come from Google Research). The TextRunner system focuses on raw natural language text, the WebTables system focuses on HTML-embedded tables, and the deep-web surfacing system focuses on "hidden" databases. The domain, expressiveness, and accuracy of extracted data can depend strongly on its source extractor; we describe differences in the characteristics of data produced by the three extractors. Finally, we discuss a series of unique data applications (some of which have already been prototyped) that are enabled by aggregating extractedWeb information.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Eugene Agichtein , Luis Gravano , Jeff Pavel , Viktoriya Sokolova , Aleksandr Voskoboynik, Snowball: a prototype system for extracting relations from large text collections, Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.612, May 21-24, 2001, Santa Barbara, California, United States
|
| |
2
|
M. Banko. Personal Communication, 2008.
|
| |
3
|
M. Banko, M. J. Cafarella, S. Soderland, M. Broadhead, and O. Etzioni. Open Information Extraction from the Web. In IJCAI, 2007.
|
| |
4
|
M. Banko and O. Etzioni. The Tradeoffs Between Open and Traditional Relational Extraction. In ACL, 2008.
|
| |
5
|
L. Barbosa and J. Freire. Siphoning hidden-web data through keyword-based interfaces. In SBBD, 2004.
|
| |
6
|
M. K. Bergman. The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 2001.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
M. J. Cafarella, A. Halevy, Y. Zhang, D. Z. Wang, and E. Wu. Uncovering the Relational Web. In WebDB, 2008.
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Cars.com FAQ. http://siy.cars.com/siy/qsg/faqGeneralInfo.jsp#howmanyads.
|
| |
12
|
Cazoodle Apartment Search. http://apartments.cazoodle.com/.
|
| |
13
|
K. C.-C. Chang, B. He, and Z. Zhang. MetaQuerier over the Deep Web: Shallow Integration across Holistic Sources. In VLDB-IIWeb, 2004.
|
 |
14
|
Oren Etzioni , Michael Cafarella , Doug Downey , Stanley Kok , Ana-Maria Popescu , Tal Shaked , Stephen Soderland , Daniel S. Weld , Alexander Yates, Web-scale information extraction in knowitall: (preliminary results), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, May 17-20, 2004, New York, NY, USA
[doi> 10.1145/988672.988687]
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
J. Madhavan, S. Jeffery, S. Cohen, X. Dong, D. Ko, C. Yu, and A. Halevy. Web-scale Data Integration: You can only afford to Pay As You Go. In CIDR, 2007.
|
| |
21
|
J. Madhavan, D. Ko, L. Kot, V. Ganapathy, A. Rasmussen, and A. Halevy. Google's Deep-Web Crawl. In VLDB, 2008.
|
| |
22
|
A. Ntoulas, P. Zerfos, and J. Cho. Downloading Textual Hidden Web Content through Keyword Queries. In JCDL, 2005.
|
 |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
P. P. Talukdar, J. Reisinger, M. Pasca, D. Ravichandran, R. Bhagat, and F. Pereira. Weakly Supervised Acquisition of Labeled Class Instances using Graph Random Walks. In EMNLP, 2008.
|
| |
26
|
Trulia. http://www.trulia.com/.
|
 |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
|