|
ABSTRACT
As HCI becomes more self-consciously implicated in cul-ture, theories from cultural studies, in particular aesthetics and critical theory, are increasingly working their way into the field. However, the use of aesthetics and critical theory in HCI remains both marginal and uneven in quality. This paper explores the state of the art of aesthetics and critical theory in the field, before going on to explore the role of these cultural theories in the analysis and deployment of the twin anchors of interaction: the user and the artifact. In concludes with a proposed mapping of aesthetics and criti-cal theory into interaction design, both as a practice and as a discipline.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Bardzell, J. Creativity in amateur multimedia: popular culture, critical theory, and HCI. Human Technology 3 (1) (2007), 12--33.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Barthes, R. The death of the author. In Heath, S. (trans). Image-Music-Text. Hill and Wang, New York (1977), 142--148.
|
| |
6
|
Bazin, A. What is Cinema? Volumes 1 and 2. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, USA. (1967).
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Blandford, A. Coherence, Community and Strategy in HCI. HCI2007; http://www.future-uk-hci.org.uk/ppts/panel_intro.ppt
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Mark Blythe , Jeffrey Bardzell , Shaowen Bardzell , Alan Blackwell, Critical issues in interaction design, Proceedings of the 22nd British CHI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008: People and Computers XXII: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, September 01-05, 2008, Liverpool, United Kingdom
|
| |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Bolter, J,&Grusin, R. Remediation. MIT Press (1999).
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Buchanon, R. Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. In Margolin, V. (ed.). Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism. (1989).
|
| |
16
|
Carnap, R. The nature of theories. In Klemke, E.D., Hollinger, R., and Rudge, D.W. (ed). Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books (1998).
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
De Beauvoir, S. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books (1989 {1952}).
|
| |
19
|
Dickie, G. Introduction to Aesthetics: An Analytic Approach. Oxford UP (1997).
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
Eco, U. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Indiana University Press, Bloomington Indian, USA (1979/1984).
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
Fishwick, P. An introduction to aesthetic computing. In Fishwick, P. (ed.) Aesthetic Computing. The MIT Press (2006), 3--28.
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure. New York: Vintage (1990 {1984}).
|
| |
26
|
Fry, T. A New Design Philosophy: An Introduction to Defuturing. New South Wales, Australia: NSWU Press. (1999).
|
| |
27
|
Gadamer, H.-G. The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
|
 |
28
|
|
 |
29
|
|
 |
30
|
William W. Gaver , John Bowers , Andrew Boucher , Hans Gellerson , Sarah Pennington , Albrecht Schmidt , Anthony Steed , Nicholas Villars , Brendan Walker, The drift table: designing for ludic engagement, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria
[doi> 10.1145/985921.985947]
|
| |
31
|
Graham, G. Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics. Routledge (1997).
|
 |
32
|
|
| |
33
|
Hammermeister, K. The German Aesthetic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Books (1998).
|
 |
34
|
|
| |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
Kivy, P. (ed.). The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Blackwell Publishing (2004).
|
| |
37
|
|
| |
38
|
McLaren, M. Feminism, Foucault, and Embodied Subjectivity. State University of New York Press (2002).
|
| |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
Levinson, J. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford UP (2003).
|
| |
41
|
|
| |
42
|
Manovich, L. The Language of New Media. MIT Press (2001).
|
| |
43
|
Nelson, H., and Stolterman, E. The Design Way. Educational Technology Publications (2002).
|
| |
44
|
Nielsen, J. Ten usability heuristics. Online: www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html
|
| |
45
|
Norman, D. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988).
|
 |
46
|
|
| |
47
|
|
| |
48
|
Rehm, M., André, E., Nakano, Y., Nishida, T. Enculturating HCI (http://mm-werkstatt.informatik.uni-augsburg.de/documents/EHCI/)
|
 |
49
|
|
 |
50
|
|
 |
51
|
|
| |
52
|
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., and Preece, J. Interaction Design. John Wiley&Sons, Ltd. (2007).
|
| |
53
|
Shusterman, R. Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art. Lanham, MD: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers (2000).
|
| |
54
|
Stroll, A. Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Columbia UP (2000).
|
| |
55
|
Tompkins, J. (ed.). Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. The Johns Hopins University Press: Baltimore USA (1980).
|
| |
56
|
Udsen, L, and Jørgensen, A. The Aesthetic Turn. Digital Creativity, 16 (4), 205--216.
|
| |
57
|
Willis, A.M. (2006). Ontological designing. Design Philosophy Papers. #02/2006.
|
| |
58
|
|
|