ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.03 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Studying intelligent systems table of contents
Pages 2119-2128  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Brian Y. Lim  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Anind K. Dey  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Daniel Avrahami  Intel Research Seattle, Seattle, WA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 54,   Downloads (12 Months): 283,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1519023
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Context-aware intelligent systems employ implicit inputs, and make decisions based on complex rules and machine learning models that are rarely clear to users. Such lack of system intelligibility can lead to loss of user trust, satisfaction and acceptance of these systems. However, automatically providing explanations about a system's decision process can help mitigate this problem. In this paper we present results from a controlled study with over 200 participants in which the effectiveness of different types of explanations was examined. Participants were shown examples of a system's operation along with various automatically generated explanations, and then tested on their understanding of the system. We show, for example, that explanations describing why the system behaved a certain way resulted in better understanding and stronger feelings of trust. Explanations describing why the system did not behave a certain way, resulted in lower understanding yet adequate performance. We discuss implications for the use of our findings in real-world context-aware applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Amazon Mechanical Turk. http://www.mturk.com. Retrieved 16 Sep 2008.
 
2
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R.,&Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167--207.
 
3
Andrews, R., Diederich, J.&Tickle, A. (1995). A Survey and Critique of Techniques for Extracting Rules from Trained Artificial Neural Networks. Knowledge Based Systems. 8: 373--389.
 
4
Assad, M., Carmichael, D.J., Kay, J.&Kummerfeld, B. (2007). PersonisAD: Distributed, Active, Scrutable Model Framework for Context-Aware Services. Pervasive 2007, 55--72.
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
Davis, R., Buchanan, B., and Shortliffe, E. (1977). Production rules as a representation for a knowledge-based consultation program. Artificial Intelligence, 8(1): 15--45.
10
 
11
Dourish, P., Adler, A.&Smith, B.C. (1996). Organising User Interfaces Around Reflective Accounts. Reflection'96, 235--244.
 
12
 
13
Google Web Toolkit. http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/. Retrieved 16 Sep 2008.
 
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
McGuinness, D.L., Glass, A., Wolverton, M.&Pinheiro da Silva, P. (2007). A Categorization of Explanation Questions for Task Processing Systems. AAAI Workshop on Explanation-Aware Computing.
 
19
Muir, B. (1994). Trust in automation: Part i. theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11): 1905--1922.
20
 
21
Norman, Donald A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York, Doubleday.
 
22
 
23
24
 
25
 
26
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3): 94--104.
 
27
Weiser, M.&Brown, J.S., (1995). Designing Calm Technology. PowerGrid Journal v1.01.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Brian Y. Lim: colleagues
Anind K. Dey: colleagues
Daniel Avrahami: colleagues