Semantically structured tag clouds: an empirical evaluation of clustered presentation approaches

ABSTRACT

Tag clouds have become a frequently used interaction technique in the web. Recently several approaches to present tag clouds with the tags semantically clustered have been proposed. However, it remains unclear whether the expected gains in performance and advantages in interaction actually can be realized as no empirical evaluations of such approaches are available yet. In this paper we describe a series of experiments designed to evaluate the effects of semantic versus alphabetical and random arrangements of tags in tag clouds. The results of our work indicate that semantically clustered tag clouds can provide improvements over random layouts in specific search tasks and that they tend to increase the attention towards tags in small fonts compared to other layouts. Also, semantically structured tag clouds were preferred by about half of the users for general search tasks. Tag cloud layout does not seem to influence the ability to remember tags.

REFERENCES

• 1: Banerjee, S. and Pedersen, T. Extended gloss overlaps as a measure of semantic relatedness. In Proc. Artificial Intelligence. 2003. 805--810
• 2: Scott Bateman , Carl Gutwin , Miguel Nacenta, Seeing things in the clouds: the effect of visual features on tag cloud selections, Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, June 19-21, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA, USA [doi>10.1145/1379092.1379130]
• 3: Ivan Berlocher , Kyung-il Lee , Kono Kim, TopicRank: bringing insight to users, Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, July 20-24, 2008, Singapore, Singapore [doi>10.1145/1390334.1390460]
• 4: Alexander Budanitsky , Graeme Hirst, Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness, Computational Linguistics, v.32 n.1, p.13-47, March 2006 [doi>10.1162/coli.2006.32.1.13]
• 5: Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. 1998
• 6: Ko Fujimura , Shigeru Fujimura , Tatsushi Matsubayashi , Takeshi Yamada , Hidenori Okuda, Topigraphy: visualization for large-scale tag clouds, Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, April 21-25, 2008, Beijing, China [doi>10.1145/1367497.1367669]
• 7: Martin J. Halvey , Mark T. Keane, An assessment of tag presentation techniques, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, May 08-12, 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada [doi>10.1145/1242572.1242826]
• 8: Hassan-Montero, Y.,&Herrero-Solana, V. Improving tagclouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. Proc. InfoSciT 2006.
• 9: Marti A. Hearst , Daniela Rosner, Tag Clouds: Data Analysis Tool or Social Signaller?, Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p.160, January 07-10, 2008 [doi>10.1109/HICSS.2008.422]
• 10: Byron Y-L Kuo , Thomas Hentrich , Benjamin M . Good , Mark D. Wilkinson, Tag clouds for summarizing web search results, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, May 08-12, 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada [doi>10.1145/1242572.1242766]
• 11: A. W. Rivadeneira , Daniel M. Gruen , Michael J. Muller , David R. Millen, Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1240624.1240775]
• 12: James Sinclair , Michael Cardew-Hall, The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful?, Journal of Information Science, v.34 n.1, p.15-29, February 2008 [doi>10.1177/0165551506078083]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.m Miscellaneous

General Terms:
Experimentation

Keywords:
clustering, folksonomy, tag clouds, visualization