ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
From x-rays to silly putty via Uranus: serendipity and its role in web search
Full text PdfPdf (790 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Web searching and browsing table of contents
Pages 2033-2036  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Paul André  University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Jaime Teevan  Microsoft Research, Redmond, VA, USA
Susan T. Dumais  Microsoft Research, Redmond, VA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 142,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1519009
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The act of encountering information unexpectedly has long been identified as valuable, both as a joy in itself and as part of task-focused problem solving. There has been a concern that highly accurate search engines and targeted personalization may reduce opportunities for serendipity on the Web. We examine whether there is the potential for serendipitous encounters during Web search, and whether improving search relevance through personalization reduces this potential. By studying Web search query logs and the results people judge relevant and interesting, we find many of the queries people perform return interesting (potentially serendipitous) results that are not directly relevant. Rather than harming serendipity, personalization appears to identify interesting results in addition to relevant ones.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Erdelez, S. Information encountering: It's more than just bumping into information, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 25,3(1999) 25--29.
 
3
 
4
Foster, A.&Ford, N. Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study, J. Documentation 59,3 (2003) 321--340.
5
 
6
Johnson, S. B. (2006), Can we please kill this meme now. Retrieved 14 Sep 2008: http://tinyurl.com/sbjohnson
 
7
McKeen, W. (2006), The endangered joy of serendipity, St. Petersburg Times Retrieved Sep 2008 http://tinyurl.com/mckeen
 
8
Ranie, L.&Shermak, J. (2005), Pew Internet and American Life Project: Data memo on search engine use. Retrieved 14 Sep 2008: http://pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SearchData_1105.pdf
9
10
 
11
 
12
Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T.&Horvitz, E. Beyond the commons: on the value of personalizing Web search. Proc PIA'05, 84--92.
13
 
14
Toms, E. Serendipitous information retrieval, Proc of the First DELOS Network of Excellence Workshop on Information Seeking, Searching and Querying in Digital Libraries, 2000.
 
15
Van Andel, P. Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science45, 2 (1994), 631--648.
 
16
Wolfe, M., Schreiner, M., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P., Kintsch, W.&Landauer, T. Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by Latent Semantic Analysis, Discourse Processes 25, (1998) 309--336.
17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul André: colleagues
Jaime Teevan: colleagues
Susan T. Dumais: colleagues