ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The problem of consistency in the design of Fitts' law experiments: consider either target distance and width or movement form and scale
Full text PdfPdf (832 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Understanding UI 2 table of contents
Pages 1809-1818  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Author
Yves Guiard  CNRS & TELECOM ParisTech, Paris, France
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 198,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518980
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An intriguing anomaly of the usual way of designing Fitts' law experiments in experimental psychology and HCI is exposed: experiments are traditionally designed so as to carefully balance two ancillary factors, target distance D and target width W, but not task difficulty, the factor unanimously thought to be crucial. Troubling factor confounds and hence quantitative estimation errors result from this inconsistency. The problem, it is suggested, may be fixed if the equivocalness of the fractional expression D/W that appears on the right-hand side of Fitts' law equations is acknowledged. This two-degree-of-freedom expression can be taken to specify either D and W or the form F and the scale S of the movement task. The paper ends up with practical recommendations for the design of consistent Fitts' law experiments. In most cases eliminating one factor will allow a safer estimation of Fitts' law parameters, while simplifying the experimental work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abrams, R.A., Kornblum, S., Meyer, D.E.,&Wright, C.E. (1983). Fitts' law: Optimization of initial ballistic impulses for aimed movements. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 335.
 
2
Card, S.K., English, W.K.,&Burr, B.J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601--613.
 
3
Elliott, D., Helsen, W.F.&Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342--357.
 
4
Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381--391 (reprinted in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1992, 121(3), 262--269).
 
5
Fitts, P.M.,&Peterson, J.R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103--112.
 
6
Guiard, Y. (1993). On Fitts' and Hooke's laws: simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychologica, 82, 139--159.
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
Hoffmann, E.R. (1996). The use of dimensional analysis in movement studies. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28 (2), 113--123.
 
13
ISO. ISO/DIS 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. International Standard, International Organization for Standardization (2000).
 
14
Jagacinski, R.J., Repperger, D.W., Moran, M.S., Ward, S.L.,&Glass, B. (1980). Fitts' law and the microstructure of rapid discrete movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 309--320.
 
15
Langolf, G.D., Chaffin, D.B.,&Foulke, J.A. (1976). An investigation of Fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 113--128.
 
16
Luce, R.D. (2003). Whatever happened to information theory in psychology? Review of General Psychology, 7, 183--188.
 
17
 
18
MacKenzie, I.S.,&Soukoreff, R.W. (2002). Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 147--198.
 
19
McMahon, T.A.& Bonner, J.T. (1983). On Size and Life. New York. Scientific American Library.
 
20
Meehl, P.E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L.L. Harlow, S.A. Mulaik, and J.H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 393--425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Available online at http://www.tc.umn.edu/~pemeehl/169ProblemIsEpistemology.pdf
 
21
Meyer, D.E., Abrams, R.A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C.E.,&Smith, J.E.K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340--370.
 
22
Plamondon, R.,&Alimi, A.M. (1997). Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 279--349.
 
23
Schmidt, R.A., Zelaznik, H.N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J.S.,&Quinn, J.T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415--451.
 
24
Shannon, C.E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379--423 and 623--656.
 
25
 
26
Thompson, D'Arcy W. (1917 and later editions). On Growth and Form. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
 
27
Welford, A.T. (1968). Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.
 
28
Woodworth, R.S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, (Monograph Supplement), 1--119.
 
29
Wright, C.E. (1993). Evaluating the special role of time in the control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 82, 5--52.
 
30
31