Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving

ABSTRACT

The typical information worker is interrupted every 12 minutes, and half of the time they are interrupting themselves. However, most of the research on interruption in the area of human-computer interaction has focused on understanding and managing interruptions from external sources. Internal interruptions -- user-initiated switches away from a task prior to its completion -- are not well understood. In this paper we describe a qualitative study of self-interruption on the computer. Using a grounded theory approach, we identify seven categories of self-interruptions in computer-related activities. These categories are derived from direct observations of users, and describe the motivation, potential consequences, and benefits associated with each type of self-interruption observed. Our research extends the understanding of the self-interruption phenomenon, and informs the design of systems to support discretionary task interleaving on the computer.

REFERENCES

• 1: Piotr D. Adamczyk , Brian P. Bailey, If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.271-278, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985727]
• 2: Liam Bannon , Allen Cypher , Steven Greenspan , Melissa L. Monty, Evaluation and analysis of users' activity organization, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.54-57, December 12-15, 1983, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/800045.801580]
• 3: Jakob Bardram , Jonathan Bunde-Pedersen , Mads Soegaard, Support for activity-based computing in a personal computing operating system, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1124772.1124805]
• 4: Stuart K. Card , Austin Henderson, Jr., A multiple, virtual-workspace interface to support user task switching, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.53-59, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 5: Cellier J.M.,&Eyrolle H. Interference between switched tasks, Ergonomics, 35, 1 (1992), 25--36.
• 6: Edward B. Cutrell , Mary Czerwinski , Eric Horvitz, Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks, CHI '00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/633292.633351]
• 7: Czikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Collins, NY, NY, 1990.
• 8: Mary Czerwinski , Eric Horvitz , Susan Wilhite, A diary study of task switching and interruptions, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.175-182, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985715]
• 9: Anton N. Dragunov , Thomas G. Dietterich , Kevin Johnsrude , Matthew McLaughlin , Lida Li , Jonathan L. Herlocker, TaskTracer: a desktop environment to support multi-tasking knowledge workers, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, January 10-13, 2005, San Diego, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1040830.1040855]
• 10: Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14, 4 (1989), 532--550.
• 11: Finstad K., Bink M., McDaniel M.,&Einstein G. O. Breaks and task switches in prospective memory, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 5 (2006), 705--712.
• 12: Glaser, B.G.,&Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishing Co, Chicago, IL, US, 1967.
• 13: Victor M. González , Gloria Mark, "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.113-120, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985707]
• 14: Shamsi T. Iqbal , Eric Horvitz, Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1240624.1240730]
• 15: Jett Q. R.,&George J. M. Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life, Academy of Management Review, 28, 3 (2003), 494--507.
• 16: Gloria Mark , Victor M. Gonzalez , Justin Harris, No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055017]
• 17: Martin, P.Y.,&B.A. Turner. Grounded theory and organizational research," The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,22, 2 (1986) 141--157.
• 18: Daniel McFarlane, Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, v.17 n.1, p.63-139, March 2002 [doi>10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_2]
• 19: Mintzberg, H. The Nature of Managerial Work. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, USA, 1973.
• 20: Miyata Y.,&Norman D. Psychological issues in support of multiple activities, In: User Centered Systems Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (1986) 265--284.
• 21: Brid O'Conaill , David Frohlich, Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.262-263, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223355.223665]
• 22: Paschler, H., Johnston, J.C.,&Ruthruff, E. Attention and Performance, Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (2001), 629--651.
• 23: Payne S. J., Duggan G. B.,&Neth H. Discretionary task interleaving: Heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 3 (2007), 370--388.
• 24: Perlow L. The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1 (1999), 57--81.
• 25: Tye Rattenbury , John Canny, CAAD: an automatic task support system, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1240624.1240731]
• 26: Stephen Reder , Robert G. Schwab, The temporal structure of cooperative activity, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.303-316, October 07-10, 1990, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/99332.99363]
• 27: George Robertson , Maarten van Dantzich , Daniel Robbins , Mary Czerwinski , Ken Hinckley , Kirsten Risden , David Thiel , Vadim Gorokhovsky, The Task Gallery: a 3D window manager, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.494-501, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/332040.332482]
• 28: Shrout P. E.,&Fleiss J. L. Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability, Psychological Bulletin, 86, 2 (1979), 420--428.
• 29: Sproull L. S. The nature of managerial attention, Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, 1 (1984), 9--27.
• 30: Strauss, A.,&Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Processes for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1998.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
attention, interruption, multi-tasking, self-interruption, task-switching, work fragmentation, work spheres