ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
So you know you're getting the best possible information: a tool that increases Wikipedia credibility
Full text PdfPdf (756 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Studying Wikipedia table of contents
Pages 1505-1508  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Peter Pirolli  Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Evelin Wollny  Knowledge Media Research Center, Tuebingen, Germany
Bongwon Suh  Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 32,   Downloads (12 Months): 193,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518929
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted to study how credibility judgments about Wikipedia are affected by providing users with an interactive visualization (WikiDashboard) of article and author editing history. Overall, users who self-reported higher use of Internet information and higher rates of Wikipedia usage tended to produce lower credibility judgments about Wikipedia articles and authors. However, use of WikiDashboard significantly increased article and author credibility judgments, with effect sizes larger than any other measured effects of background media usage and attitudes on Wikiepedia credibility. The results suggest that increased exposure to the editing/authoring histories of Wikipedia increases credibility judgments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Akerlof, G.A. The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 1970, 488--500.
 
2
Chesney, T. An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility. First Monday, 11 (11) 2006.
 
3
Flanagin, A.J. and Metzger, M.J. Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77 (3) 2000, 515--540.
4
 
5
Giles, J. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438 2005, 900--901.
 
6
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L. and Kelley, H.H. Communication and persuasion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953.
7
 
8
Rieh, S.Y. and Danielson, D.R. Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Information Today, Medford, NJ, 2007, 307--364.
 
9
Snell, E.J. A scaling procedure for ordered categorical data. Biometrics, 20 (3) 1964, 592--607.
10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Peter Pirolli: colleagues
Evelin Wollny: colleagues
Bongwon Suh: colleagues