ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An intuitive model of perceptual grouping for HCI design
Full text PdfPdf (3.13 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Cognitive modeling and assessment table of contents
Pages 1331-1340  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Ruth Rosenholtz  MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Nathaniel R. Twarog  MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld  MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Martin Wattenberg  IBM Watson Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 51,   Downloads (12 Months): 223,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518903
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Understanding and exploiting the abilities of the human visual system is an important part of the design of usable user interfaces and information visualizations. Good design enables quick, easy and veridical perception of key components of that design. An important facet of human vision is its ability to seemingly effortlessly perform "perceptual organization; it transforms individual feature estimates into perception of coherent regions, structures, and objects. We perceive regions grouped by proximity and feature similarity, grouping of curves by good continuation, and grouping of regions of coherent texture. In this paper, we discuss a simple model for a broad range of perceptual grouping phenomena. It takes as input an arbitrary image, and returns a structure describing the predicted visual organization of the image. We demonstrate that this model can capture aspects of traditional design rules, and predicts visual percepts in classic perceptual grouping displays.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Wertheimer, M. Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, London, 1938.
 
2
Koffka, K. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Hartcourt, New York, 1935.
 
3
 
4
Kosslyn, S. M. Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3 (1989), 185--225.
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
Tullis, T. S. A computer-based tool for evaluating alphanumeric displays. INTERACT 84 (1984), 719--723.
 
9
Vincent, L. Current topics in applied morphological image analysis. In Kendall, W. S. et al., eds., Current Trends in Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications. Chapman&Hall, 1997.
 
10
Shneiderman, B., Chimera, R., Jog, N., Stimart, R.,&White, D. Evaluating spatial and texture style of displays. In MacDonald, L. W. and Lowe, A. C., eds., Display Systems: Design and Applications. John Wiley&Sons, Chichester, U.K., 1997.
 
11
 
12
Healey, C.G., Booth, K.S.,&Enns, J.T. Harnessing preattentive processes for multivariate data visualization. Proc. Graphics Interface '93 (1993), 107--117.
 
13
 
14
Field, D. J., Hayes, A.,&Hess, R. F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local association field. Vision Research, 33 (1993), 173--193.
 
15
 
16
Mumford, D. Elastica and computer vision. In Algebraic Geometry and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, NY, 1994.
 
17
Grossberg, S.&Mingolla, E. Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations. Perception&Psychophysics, 38 (1985), 141--171.
 
18
 
19
Ohlander, R., Price, K.,&Reddy, R. Picture segmentation by a recursive region splitting method. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 8 (1978), 313--333.
 
20
Witkin, A. P. Scale-space filtering. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (1983), 1019--1022.
 
21
Koenderink, J. J. The structure of images. Biological Cybernetics, 50 (1984), 363--370.
 
22
23
 
24
Palmer, S. E. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9 (1977), 441--474.
 
25
Navon, D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9 (1977), 353--383.
 
26
 
27
Malik, J.&Perona, P. A computational model of texture segmentation. Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1989), 326--332.
 
28
 
29
 
30
Geman, S.&Geman, D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis&Machine Intelligence, 6 (1984), 721--741.
 
31
32
 
33
Paris, S.&Durand, F. A fast approximation of the bi-lateral filter using a signal processing approach. Proc. European Conf. Computer Vision (2006), 568--580.
 
34
Julesz, B. A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on the first order statistics of textons. Biological Cybernetics, 41 (1981), 131--138.
 
35
Beck, J. Textural segmentation, second-order statistics,&textural elements. Biol. Cybern., 48 (1983), 125--130.
 
36
Voorhees, H.&Poggio, T. Computing texture boundaries from images. Nature, 333 (1988), 364--367.
 
37
Li, Z. Pre-attentive segmentation in the primary visual cortex. Spatial Vision, 13 (2000), 25--50.
 
38
Helmholtz, H. Handbook of Physiological Optics. Vol. 3, The Perceptions of Vision. Optical Society of America, Rochester, 1925.
 
39
Paris, S.&Durand, F. A topological approach to hierarchical segmentation using mean shift. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision&Pattern Recognition (2007), 1--8.
 
40
 
41
Geisler, W. S., Perry, J. S., Super, B. J.,&Gallogly, D. P. Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Research, 41 (2001), 711--724.
 
42
 
43
Schinkel-Bielefeld, N. Contour integration models predicting human behavior. University of Bremen, 2007. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46diss000-108845.
 
44
 
45
Ren, X., Fowlkes, C.,&Malik, J. Figure/ground assignment in natural images. Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision (2006), 614--627.
 
46
C.I.E. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color difference equations, psychometric color terms. Supp. No. 2 to CIE publ. 15 (E.-1.3.1) 1971/(TC-1.3.) (1978).
 
47
 
48
 
49
Landy, M. S.&Bergen, J. R. Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vis. Research, 31 (1991), 679--691.
 
50
Marr, D. and Hildreth, E. C. Theory of edge detection. Proc. Royal Society, London B, 207 (1980), 187--217.
 
51
Logan, G. The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 4 (1996), 603--649.
 
52
Watt, R., Ledgeway, T., and Dakin, S. C. Families of models for Gabor paths demonstrate the importance of spatial adjacency. Journal of Vision, 8, 7 (2008), 1--19. htp://journalofvision.org/8/7/23/.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ruth Rosenholtz: colleagues
Nathaniel R. Twarog: colleagues
Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld: colleagues
Martin Wattenberg: colleagues