ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Finding canonical behaviors in user protocols
Full text PdfPdf (479 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: User studies and design table of contents
Pages 1323-1326  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Walter C. Mankowski  Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Peter Bogunovich  Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Ali Shokoufandeh  Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Dario D. Salvucci  Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 128,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518900
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While the collection of behavioral protocols has been common practice in human-computer interaction research for many years, the analysis of large protocol data sets is often extremely tedious and time-consuming, and automated analysis methods have been slow to develop. This paper proposes an automated method of protocol analysis to find canonical behaviors --- a small subset of protocols that is most representative of the full data set, providing a reasonable "big picture" view of the data with as few protocols as possible. The automated method takes advantage of recent algorithmic developments in computational vision, modifying them to allow for distance measures between behavioral protocols. The paper includes an application of the method to web-browsing protocols, showing how the canonical behaviors found by the method match well to sets of behaviors identified by expert human coders.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
Ericsson, K.A.,&Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
8
9
 
10
Levenshtein, V. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Daklady, 10, 707--710.
11
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Taatgen, N. A.,&Lee, F. J. (2003). Production compilation: A simple mechanism to model complex skill acquisition. Human Factors, 45, 61--76.
 
18
Toh, K.C., Todd, M.J.,&Tutuncu, R. (1999). SDPT3: a Matlab package for semidefinite programming. Optimization Methods and Software, 11, 545--581.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Walter C. Mankowski: colleagues
Peter Bogunovich: colleagues
Ali Shokoufandeh: colleagues
Dario D. Salvucci: colleagues