ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Mixing it up: recommending collections of items
Full text PdfPdf (644 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Classifying and recommending content table of contents
Pages 1217-1226  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Derek L. Hansen  University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Jennifer Golbeck  University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30,   Downloads (12 Months): 187,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518883
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems traditionally recommend individual items. We introduce the idea of collection recommender systems and describe a design space for them including 3 main aspects that contribute to the overall value of a collection: the value of the individual items, co-occurrence interaction effects, and order effects including placement and arrangement of items. We then describe an empirical study examining how people create mix tapes. The study found qualitative and quantitative evidence for order effects (e.g., first songs are rated higher than later songs; some songs go poorly together sequentially). We propose several ideas for research in this space, hoping to start a much longer conversation on collection recommender systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Bradley, K., and Smyth, B. Improving recommendation diversity. In AAAI'01 (2001).
 
4
Cunningham, S., Jones, M., and Jones, S. Organizing digital music for use: An examination of personal music collections. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR04), pp. 447--454.
5
 
6
Golbeck, J., and Hendler, J. FilmTrust: Movie recommendations using trust in web-based social networks. IEEE CCNC (2006).
7
 
8
Lee, J. H., and Downie, J. S. Survey of music information needs, uses, and seeking behaviours: Preliminary findings. In ISMI (2004), pp. 441--446.
9
10
 
11
 
12
Pampalk, E., Flexer, A., and Widmer, G. Hierarchical organization and description of music collections at the artist level. In ECDL '05 (2005), pp. 37--48.
 
13
Pauws, S., and Eggen, B. PATS: Realization and user evaluation of an automatic playlist generator. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (2002), pp. 222--230.
 
14
Pauws, S., and van de Wijdeven, S. Evaluation of a new interactive playlist generation concept. In ISMIR International Conf. on Music Information Retrieval (2005), pp. 638--643.
 
15
Tzanetakis, G. Musical genre classification of audio signals. In IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing (2002), pp. 293--302.
16
17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Derek L. Hansen: colleagues
Jennifer Golbeck: colleagues