ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design
Full text PdfPdf (728 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Sustainability 2 table of contents
Pages 1053-1062  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
William Odom  Indiana University at Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
James Pierce  Indiana University at Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
Erik Stolterman  Indiana University at Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
Eli Blevis  Indiana University at Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 66,   Downloads (12 Months): 294,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518862
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper takes up the problem of understanding why we preserve some things passionately and discard others without thought. We briefly report on the theoretical literature relating to this question, both in terms of existing literature in HCI, as well as in terms of related literatures that can advance the understanding for the HCI community. We use this reading to refine our frameworks for understanding durability in digital artifice as an issue of sustainable interaction design in HCI. Next, we report in detail on our ongoing work in collecting personal inventories of digital artifice in the home context. We relate our prior and most current personal inventories collections to the framework that owes to our reading of the theoretical literature. Finally, we summarize the theoretical implications and findings of our personal inventories work in terms of implications for the design of digital artifice in a manner that is more durable.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ayres, R.U. (1995). Life cycle analysis: A critique. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 14. 199--223.
2
 
3
Blevis, E.&Stolterman, E. (2007). Ensoulment and Sustainable Interaction Design. In Proc. of IASDR 2007. Hong Kong.
 
4
5
 
6
Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences And Empathy. Earthscan.
 
7
Cooper, T. (2005). Inadequate Life? Evidence of Consumer Attitudes to Product Obsolescence Journal of Consumer Policy. 27. 421--449.
 
8
Cooper, T. (2002). Durable consumption: reflections on product life cycles and the throwaway society. In Hertwich, E. (ed.) Proc. of Lifecycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption Workshop. 11--27.
 
9
Csíkszentmihályi, M.&Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press.
 
10
Durgee, J. (2001). Soul Branding: How to do it. Design Management Journal (Winter). 40--45.
 
11
Foth, M., Satchell, C., Paulos, E., Igoe, T.,&Ratti, C. (2008). Persuasive Pervasive Technology and Environmental Sustainability. In Proc. Pervasive '08 Workshops.
 
12
Fry, T. (2008). Design Futuring. Berg Publishing.
13
14
 
15
Hasbrouck, J., Igoe, T., Mankoff, J.,&Woodruff, A. (2007). Ubiquitous Sustainability: Technologies for Green Values. In Proc. Ubicomp '07 Workshops. 567--568.
 
16
Hertvich, E. (2002). Introduction to Life Cycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption. In Hertvich, E. (Ed.). In Proc. Lifecycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption. 2(3).
17
18
 
19
Jordan, P.W. (2002). Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. CRC Press.
20
 
21
McDonough, W.&Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press. New York.
22
 
23
 
24
Norman, D.A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.
25
26
 
27
Paulos, E., Forth, M., Satchell, S., Kim, Y., Dourish, P.,&Choi, J. (2008, in press). Ubiquitous Sustainability: Citizen Science&Activism. In Proc of Ubicomp '08 Workshops.
28
 
29
van Hinte, E. (ed) (1997). Eternally Yours: visions on product endurance, Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
 
30
Verbeek, P-P. (2006). Acting Artifacts - the Technological Mediation of Action, in Verbeek, P.P.&Slob, A. (Eds.). User Behavior and Technology Development - Shaping Sustainable Relations between Consumers and Technologies. 53--60. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
 
31
Verbeek, P-P. (2005). What Things Do - Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. The Pennsylvania State Press.
 
32
Verbeek, P-P.&Kockelkoren, P. (1998). The Things That Matter. In Design Issues. MIT Press, 14(3). 28--42.
 
33
von Weizsäcker, E, Lovins, A.,&Lovins, H. (1997). Factor Four. London: Earthscan.
 
34
Walker, S. (2006). Object Lessons: Enduring Artifacts and Sustainable Solutions. Design Issues. MIT Press, 22(1). 20--31.
35
36


Collaborative Colleagues:
William Odom: colleagues
James Pierce: colleagues
Erik Stolterman: colleagues
Eli Blevis: colleagues