ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
'Helpfulness' in online communities: a measure of message quality
Full text PdfPdf (783 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Social networking sites table of contents
Pages 955-964  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Author
Jahna Otterbacher  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 45,   Downloads (12 Months): 287,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518848
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Online communities displaying textual postings require measures to combat information overload. One popular approach is to ask participants whether or not messages are helpful in order to then guide others to interesting content. Adopting a well-established framework for assessing data quality, we examine the nature of "helpfulness."We study consumer reviews at Amazon.com, deriving 22 measures quantifying their textual properties, authors' reputations and product characteristics. Confirmatory factor analysis reveals five underlying quality dimensions representing reviewers' reputations in the community, the topical relevancy of the reviews, the ease of understanding them, their believability and objectivity. A correlation and regression analysis confirms that these dimensions are related to the helpfulness scores assigned by community participants. However, it also uncovers a strong relationship between the chronological ordering of reviews and helpfulness, which both community participants and designers should keep in mind when using this method of social navigation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Chevalier, J.A. and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 3 (2006), 345--354.
 
2
David, S. and Pinch, T. Six degrees of reputation: the use and abuse of online review and recommendation systems. First Monday 11, 3 (2006).
 
3
Foltz, P.W., Laham, D., Landauer, T.K. Automated essay scoring: Applications to educational technology. In Proc. EdMedia, (1999).
4
5
 
6
Gorsuch, R.L. Factor Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1983.
 
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Kaiser, H.F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, (1960), 141--151.
12
 
13
Loehlin, J. C. Latent Variable Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
 
14
 
15
Otterbacher, J. Managing information in online product review communities: a comparison of two approaches. In Proc. 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2008), Association for Information Systems (2008).
16
 
17
18
 
19
Rindova, V., Petkova, A.P. and Kotha, S. Standing out: How new firms in emerging marketing build reputation and knowledge creation. Strategic Organization 5, 31 (2007), 31--70.
 
20
 
21
 
22
Schindler, R.M. and Bickart, B. Published word of mouth: Referable, consumer-generated information on the Internet. In: Hauvgedt, C., Machleit, K. and Yalch, R. (eds.) Online Consumer Psychology: Understanding and Influencing Behavior in the Virtual World. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005, 35--61.
 
23
 
24
25