Remembrance of things tagged: how tagging effort affects tag production and human memory

ABSTRACT

We developed a low-effort interaction method called Click2Tag for social bookmarking. Information foraging theory predicts that the production of tags will increase as the effort required to do so is lowered, while the amount of time invested decreases. However, models of human memory suggest that changes in the tagging process may affect subsequent human memory for the tagged material. We compared (1) low-effort tagging by mouse-clicking (Click2Tag), (2) traditional tagging by typing (type-to-tag), and (3) baseline, no tagging conditions. Our results suggest that (a) Click2Tag increases tagging rates, (b) Click2Tag improves recognition of facts from the tagged text when compared to type-to-tag, and (c) Click2Tag is comparable to the no-tagging baseline condition on recall measures. Results suggest that tagging by clicking strengthens the memory traces by repeated readings of relevant words in the text and, thus, improves recognition.

REFERENCES

• 1: Anderson, J.R. Learning and memory: An integrated approach. John Wiley, New York, 2000.
• 2: Anderson, J.R. and Lebiere, C. The atomic components of thought. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
• 3: Anderson, J.R. and Reder, L.M. An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In Cermak, L.S. and Craik, F.I.M. eds. Levels of processing in human memory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1979.
• 4: Aaron Bauer , Kenneth Koedinger, Pasting and Encoding: Note-Taking in Online Courses, Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, p.789-793, July 05-07, 2006
• 5: Aaron Bauer , Kenneth R. Koedinger, Selection-based note-taking applications, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1240624.1240773]
• 6: Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2006
• 7: Bobrow, D. and Bower, G. Comprehension and recall of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 455--461.
• 8: Bradshaw, G. and Anderson, J.R. Elaborative encoding as an explanation of levels of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 165--174.
• 9: Bretzing, B. and Kulhavy, R. Note-taking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 145--153.
• 10: Charnov, E.L. Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129--136.
• 11: Elizabeth F. Churchill , Jonathan Trevor , Sara Bly , Les Nelson , Davor Cubranic, Anchored conversations: chatting in the context of a document, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.454-461, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/332040.332475]
• 12: Lichan Hong , Ed H. Chi , Raluca Budiu , Peter Pirolli , Les Nelson, SparTag.us: a low cost tagging system for foraging of web content, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, May 28-30, 2008, Napoli, Italy [doi>10.1145/1385569.1385582]
• 13: Catherine C. Marshall, Annotation: from paper books to the digital library, Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries, p.131-140, July 23-26, 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/263690.263806]
• 14: Kenton O'Hara , Abigail Sellen, A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.335-342, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258787]
• 15: Peter L. T. Pirolli, Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, 2007
• 16: Pirolli, P. and Recker, M. Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 235--275.
• 17: Pirolli, P.L. and Anderson, J.R. The role of practice in fact retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 136--153.
• 18: Stephens, D.W. and Krebs, J.R. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986.
• 19: Dennis M. Wilkinson, Strong regularities in online peer production, Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, July 08-12, 2008, Chicago, Il, USA [doi>10.1145/1386790.1386837]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.m MISCELLANEOUS

General Terms:
Human Factors, Theory

Keywords:
information foraging theory, memory, social bookmarking, tagging