ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups
Full text PdfPdf (1.05 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Computer mediated communication 1 table of contents
Pages 537-546  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Gilly Leshed  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Diego Perez  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Jeffrey T. Hancock  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Dan Cosley  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Jeremy Birnholtz  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Soyoung Lee  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Poppy L. McLeod  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Geri Gay  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 37,   Downloads (12 Months): 225,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518784
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While most collaboration technologies are concerned with supporting particular tasks such as workflows or meetings, many work groups do not have the teamwork skills essential to effective collaboration. One way to improve teamwork is to provide dynamic feedback generated by automated analyses of behavior, such as language use. Such feedback can lead members to reflect on and subsequently improve their collaborative behavior, but might also distract from the task at hand. We have experimented with GroupMeter - a chat-based system that presents visual feedback on team members' language use. Feedback on proportion of agreement words and overall word count was presented using two different designs. When receiving feedback, teams in our study expressed more agreement in their conversations and reported greater focus on language use as compared to when not receiving feedback. This suggests that automated, real-time linguistic feedback can elicit behavioral changes, offering opportunities for future research.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bales, R.F.,&Cohen, S.P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. NY: Free Press.
2
 
3
Bergstrom, T.,&Karahalios, K. (2007). Seeing More: Visualizing Audio Cues. Proc. of INTERACT'07, 29--42.
 
4
Bosworth, K. (1994). Developing collaborative skills in college students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 59, 25--31.
 
5
Bransford, J. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: Nat'l Academy Press.
6
 
7
Cassell, J.,&Tversky, D. (2005). The language of online intercultural community formation. JCMC, 10(2).
8
 
9
Chung, C.K.,&Pennebaker, J.W. (2007). The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication: Frontiers of social psychology (343--359). New York: Psychology Press.
 
10
Cummings J., Finholt, T., Foster, I.,&Kesselman, C. (2008). Beyond being there: A blueprint for advancing the design, development, and evaluation of virtual organizations. Building Effective Virtual Organizations workshop.
11
 
12
 
13
Duval, S.,&Wicklund, R.A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York Academic Press.
14
15
 
16
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117--140.
 
17
18
 
19
Gorman, J.C., Foltz, P.W., Kiekel, P.A., Martin, M.J.,&Cooke, N.J. (2003). Evaluation of latent semantic analysis-based measures of team communications content. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 424--428.
 
20
Hackman, J.R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 
21
 
22
 
23
Joshi, M.,&Roséé, C.P. (2007). Using transactivity in conversation summarization in educational dialog. Proc. SLaTE'07, 53--56.
 
24
25
 
26
Kulyk, O., Wang, J.,&Terken, J. (2006). Real-time feedback on nonverbal behaviour to enhance social dynamics in small group meetings. Proc. MLMI'05, 150--161.
27
 
28
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29
30
31
 
32
 
33
McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 
34
McLeod, P.L., Liker, J.K.,&Lobel, S.A. (1992). Process feedback in task groups: An application of goal setting. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 15--41.
 
35
Oakley, B., Felder, R.M., Brent, R.,&Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9--34.
 
36
 
37
Pennebaker, J.W. (2002). What our words can say about us: Toward a broader language psychology. Psychological Science Agenda, 15, 8--9.
 
38
Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E.,&Booth, R.J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count LIWC 2001. Erlbaum.
 
39
Pennebaker, J.W.,&King, L.A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296--1312.
 
40
 
41
Roberts, T.S. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
 
42
Rummel, N.,&Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201--241.
 
43
44
 
45
 
46
47
48


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gilly Leshed: colleagues
Diego Perez: colleagues
Jeffrey T. Hancock: colleagues
Dan Cosley: colleagues
Jeremy Birnholtz: colleagues
Soyoung Lee: colleagues
Poppy L. McLeod: colleagues
Geri Gay: colleagues