ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing trustworthy situated services: an implicit and explicit assessment of locative images-effect on trust
Full text PdfPdf (1.24 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Privacy and trust table of contents
Pages 329-332  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Vassilis Kostakos  University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal
Ian Oakley  University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 178,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518753
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper examines a visual design element unique to situated, hot-spot style, services: locativeness. This is the extent to which the media representing a service relates to its immediate physical environment. This paper explores the effect of locativeness on trust with two studies assessing user attitudes in depth. The first is an implicit, or preconscious, test and the second an explicit test based on voiced value judgments. To provide a richer context, the second study contrasts locativeness with other traditional aspects of design: branding and quality. The results indicate users have a strong implicit association between locative images and trust, and that this is partially reflected in their explicit choices. This is an important interface aspect that designers should consider in order to create trustworthy situated services.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Carroll, J. and Green, P. (1995). Methods in Marketing Research: Part I5 Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, pp. 385--391.
2
 
3
Greenwald, A. G.,&Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1):4--27.
 
4
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E.,&Schwarz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6):1464--1480.
 
5
6
 
7
Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV: Procedures and validity. In B. Wittenbrink&N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 695--706.
8
9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Vassilis Kostakos: colleagues
Ian Oakley: colleagues