ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display
Full text PdfPdf (11.29 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Clicking on buttons table of contents
Pages 299-308  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Chris Harrison  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Scott E. Hudson  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 88,   Downloads (12 Months): 550,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518749
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Physical buttons have the unique ability to provide low-attention and vision-free interactions through their intuitive tactile clues. Unfortunately, the physicality of these interfaces makes them static, limiting the number and types of user interfaces they can support. On the other hand, touch screen technologies provide the ultimate interface flexibility, but offer no inherent tactile qualities. In this paper, we describe a technique that seeks to occupy the space between these two extremes - offering some of the flexibility of touch screens, while retaining the beneficial tactile properties of physical interfaces.

The outcome of our investigations is a visual display that contains deformable areas, able to produce physical buttons and other interface elements. These tactile features can be dynamically brought into and out of the interface, and otherwise manipulated under program control. The surfaces we describe provide the full dynamics of a visual display (through rear projection) as well as allowing for multitouch input (though an infrared lighting and camera setup behind the display). To illustrate the tactile capabilities of the surfaces, we describe a number of variations we uncovered in our exploration and prototyping. These go beyond simple on/off actuation and can be combined to provide a range of different possible tactile expressions. A preliminary user study indicates that our dynamic buttons perform much like physical buttons in tactile search tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Benali-Khoudja, M., Hafez, M., Alexandre, J. M., Kheddar, A. Tactile Interfaces: A State of the Art Survey. In Proc. ISR '04. 721--726.
3
 
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
 
14
Kodama, S. and M. Takeno. Protrude, Flow. (Electronic Arts and Animation Catalogue) In Proc. SIGGRAPH '01. ACM Press (2001), 138.
 
15
Laitinen, P. Tactile Touch Screen. International Application PCT/EP2006/009377, filed 27 September 2006.
16
17
18
 
19
Microsoft surface. http://www.microsoft.com/surface/
20
21
 
22
Otsuka, K. and Wayman, C. M. Eds. Shape Memory Materials. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.
 
23
Overholt, D., Pasztor, E., Mazalek, A. A Multipurpose Array of Tactile Rods for Interactive sXpression (Abstracts and Applications), In Proc. SIGGRAPH '01. ACM Press (2001).
24
25
26
27
28
 
29
Rockwell, T.H. Spare Visual Capacity in Driving Revisited: New Empirical Results of an Old Idea, in Vision min Vehicles II. Elsevier (1988), 317-324.
 
30
Wagner, C. R, Lederman, S. J., Howe, R.D. A Tactile Shape Display Using RC Servomotors. Electronic Journal of Haptics Research, 3, 4.
 
31
Wickens, C.D. and Hollands, J.G. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Prentice Hall, 2000.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chris Harrison: colleagues
Scott E. Hudson: colleagues