| My Dating Site Thinks I'm a Loser: effects of personal photos and presentation intervals on perceptions of recommender systems |
| Full text |
Pdf
(615 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems
table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Online relationships
table of contents
Pages 221-224
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Shailendra Rao
|
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
|
|
Tom Hurlbutt
|
Stanford University - Intuit, Stanford, CA, USA
|
|
Clifford Nass
|
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
|
|
Nundu JanakiRam
|
Stanford University - Google, Stanford, CA, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 43, Downloads (12 Months): 307, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Receiving poor results from a personalized recommendation system is frustrating. When users try to compensate by putting on a "different face" and game the system, the results can be even more frustrating. This paper investigates how to improve the user experience of such systems by: 1) adding personal photos to increase self-awareness, and 2) providing recommendations interspersed with personal questions. A 2x2 web experiment (N=56) within the context of an online dating match recommendation system was used to assess these two effects. Displaying a person's photo stabilized both response strategies and liking of a recommender's poor suggestions. Additionally, presenting all of the results together at the end was less frustrating than spreading them out. These results demonstrate that simple interface design decisions can have profound effects on user behaviors and attitudes with personalized recommendation systems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2).
|
| |
2
|
Fejfar, M. C.&Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Effect of private self-awareness on negative affect and self-referent attribution: A quantitative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 4(2), 132--142.
|
| |
3
|
Goffman, E. (1956). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Holbrook, A., Green, M., Krosnick, J. (2003). Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 67:79--125.
|
| |
6
|
Jones, Richard R., and Rorer, Leonard G. (1973). Response Biases and Trait Descriptive Adjectives. Multivariate Behavioral Research 8, 3, 313--330.
|
| |
7
|
Paulhus, D.L. (1998). The Paulhus Deception Scales: BIDR Version 7. Toronto/Buffalo: Multi-Health Systems.
|
| |
8
|
Song, Hayeun. (2007). Seeing oneself in the media. ICA 2007.
|
| |
9
|
Zaslow, J. "If TiVo Thinks You Are Gay, Here's How To Set It Straight - Amazon.com Knows You, Too, Based on What You Buy; Why All the Cartoons?" The Wall Street Journal, sect. A, p. 1, November 26, 2002.
|
|